LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Pertamina vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Universitas Trilogi
Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
- +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
- +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
- +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
- +Supportive community and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
Nothing to show
- +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical learning and industry partnerships
- +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
- +Practical application and project engagement
- +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
- -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
- -Substandard experience for international students.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
- -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
- -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.
Nothing to show
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.
All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.
University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
Nothing to show
Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.
This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.
Nothing to show
I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show