Universidad de Sucre - Unisucre vs Khmelnytskyi National University - KhNU vs 'Angel Kanchev' University of Ruse vs Hotel and Tourism Management Institute Switzerland - HTMi vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA
Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, comprehensive pharmacy management education
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Opportunities for professional growth
- +In-depth study of specialized subjects, including foreign languages.
- +Excellent facilities and knowledgeable, kind teaching staff.
- +Acquisition of new skills and knowledge.
- +Positive social experience and meeting new people.
- +Dual degrees and career foundation
- +Reputable programs with practical experience
- +Internship opportunities and networking
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are concerning.
- -Outdated facilities are a problem.
- -A perceived lack of future prospects and academic integrity is disappointing.
- -Rude administration and dismissive professors.
- -Outdated teaching materials and lack of academic standards.
- -Disrespectful and overly critical treatment of students.
- -Chaotic and inconsistent schedules disrupt learning.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional scores characterize this university's offerings, with perfect ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life. These areas represent the institution's strongest attributes. Accomodation and Internationality received very strong marks at 4, indicating good, though not perfect, performance. Value also stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a highly satisfactory return on investment for students. Overall, the university excels in multiple key aspects of the student experience.
This institution receives uniform ratings of 1 across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas to highlight, as all aspects are rated equally low. The provided scores suggest a consistent lack of satisfaction across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value.
Academic strengths shine through for this institution, with Professors receiving the highest score at 6.9. Location also garners a solid 6.8. Areas for potential improvement include Student Life and Accomodation, both scoring 5.8, alongside Internationality at 5.7, and Facilities at 5.9, indicating these aspects are the least highly rated by students.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and global reach. Professors received a perfect score of 5, and its internationality is highly rated at 4.67. The university also scores well in location (4.5) and accommodation (4.33). Facilities and student life both earned a solid 4. Conversely, the value proposition is the weakest area, with a rating of 3.67.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 and no negative feedback, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. The Regencia de Farmacia program is praised for its comprehensive and practical education.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight strong language programs and specialized subjects, while negative reviews point to a lack of future prospects, absent professors, and building conditions.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split, with positive reviews highlighting valuable experiences and acquired skills, while negative comments indicate issues with administrative treatment and faculty carelessness.
University reviews are mixed, with ~67% positive and ~33% negative. Positive feedback highlights career foundation, dual degrees, and practical experience. Some negative comments mention scheduling issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Usually I trust reviews and they have never let me down, until 2023, when I chose to continue the bsc culinary course at this place. I wish someone told me this before my “study” there. First, I couldn’t get my proper classes schedule for 3 weeks. When the schedule finally came, it was chaotic, with daily kitchen duties overlapping with theoretical classes (By the way, I have No complaints about most of the theoretical classes, they were rare for culinary students but to the point and interesting - the only one plus). The kitchen duties were overwhelming, covering 24 days a month, and I almost never had the chance to attend a practical cooking class or even write down a single recipe, as all practical part was under MIT - people who working for HTMI as volunteers to get 1 year Swiss visa. These MIT used to talk with me very badly and always gave the task to clean or bring/peal for them vegetables, they directly told us that culinary students here to work, not enjoy their study. There was no culinary instructor for my course. And almost every event on Friday for students I had to be all day in the kitchen to cook for HTMI and after clean kitchen. I felt like I was working as a servant at the school, preparing meals and performing tasks for the kitchen MIT. The quality of the food was poor, sometimes even totally vegetarian days, and everything was prepared by the students, with the exception of desserts. Desserts were prepared with pastry students, but even pastry chef visits to the main kitchen were rare, and his desserts plating was outdated (like previous century, no one plate this way now in fine dining restaurants. Anyway, at least one teacher whom I sometimes even had to beg to attend his classes instead of “learning” how to clean kitchen and steam rice from MIT) They even taught us to plate dishes in a clock style 🤣) In the event planning class, we were expected to find our sponsors to organize an event as a part of the study, which forced us to seek support from local hotels and supermarkets, couldn’t really do it… They also forgot to give me my iPad in the beginning, when I asked, they say I’m trying to cheat them. I also had to pay my insurance twice. I was hoping on internship, but even that was below then Macdonalds level, i had to prepare sandwiches and salads for hotel staff, HTMI career center that time stoped replying my emails.. The experience was so depressing that I had to take antidepressants to cope with the stress. I strongly recommend that parents of prospective students look elsewhere in Switzerland and avoid these scams. I’m also attaching pictures from our “culinary classes” with MIT and accordingly the same food that was given to the students for 3500 franks per 12 weeks. Thank you for the attention 🙏🏼
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show