Mataram University - Unram vs Illinois Institute of Technology vs College of the Ozarks vs Darussalam Gontor University - UNIDA vs Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Mataram University - Unram: wins 1/6 categories
Illinois Institute of Technology: wins 2/6 categories
College of the Ozarks: wins 0/6 categories
Darussalam Gontor University - UNIDA: wins 3/6 categories
Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram: wins 0/6 categories
Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang: wins 0/6 categories
International College of Tourism and Management - ITM: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Point Lookout, Missouri, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Arabic Language and Culture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.50
4.33
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and complete study programs
  • +Improved facilities and infrastructure
  • +Strong graduate employability
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative and diverse learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Holistic curriculum and boarding system fostering community and skill development
  • +Supportive lecturers providing guidance and engaging in discussions
  • +Integrated daily activities and student management opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
  • -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Limited student support and unclear communication create difficulties.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.

This institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in the **Professors** category with a perfect score. **Facilities** and **Location** also stand out with high marks. **Student Life** and **Value** are rated favorably, while **Accomodation** and **Internationality** show solid but less exceptional performance, representing the areas with the lowest scores.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving high marks. Professors are also rated very favorably. The weakest area, though still good, is facilities. Location and accommodation present a solid, mid-to-high performance. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience with particular advantages in its vibrant student environment and global appeal.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the rigorous curriculum, knowledgeable faculty, and research opportunities. A minor concern was the limited scholarship availability for international students and a lack of cultural diversity among Master's students.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, all three reviews are positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight the campus's superior curriculum, dormitory system, and active lecturers. Students appreciate the holistic daily activities and opportunities for communication and skill development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
33%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
67%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

central of excellence

the campus with boarding school program, have panca jiwa and panca jangka. the pesantren model brings us to the holistic daily activity as a student to be involved in student management in tarbiyah or education knowledge.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close