State College of Technology - FATEC vs Wisconsin Lutheran College vs Sacred Heart Academy of Santa Maria Bulacan - SHA vs Andalas University vs University of San Jose-Recoletos

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Andalas University (5.00)
State College of Technology - FATEC: wins 0/4 categories
Wisconsin Lutheran College: wins 0/4 categories
Sacred Heart Academy of Santa Maria Bulacan - SHA: wins 0/4 categories
Andalas University: wins 4/4 categories
University of San Jose-Recoletos: wins 0/4 categories
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli: wins 0/4 categories
Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Event Management
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
padang, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.40
3.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.40
4.33
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.80
4.33
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.20
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.80
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Caring, genius professors
  • +High quality education

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Beautiful campus scenery
  • +Renowned professors
  • +Rich history and tradition
  • +High-quality educators and supportive administration
  • +Relevant, real-world courses and strong academic programs
  • +Excellent facilities and study spaces
  • +Knowledgeable and engaging professors
  • +Valuable professional training and career relevance
  • +Opportunities for academic growth and independence

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of resources
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts an impressive score for its professors, location, and international student experience, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also strong with 4-star ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with particular strengths in academic quality and its global appeal.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners perfect scores in all assessed aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received a top rating of 5 out of 5. Furthermore, students perceive the university as offering excellent value for their investment, also achieving a score of 5. The university demonstrates no discernible weaknesses across these metrics, presenting a consistently outstanding profile.

This university's facilities stand out as a significant strength, receiving a high rating. Areas demonstrating solid performance include professors and accommodation, both scoring a 4. Location and student life, however, present the weakest aspects, with lower ratings in comparison to other categories. Internationality and value also received moderate scores.

This institution demonstrates strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring 4.33. Professors are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. The university's weakest areas lie in its facilities, student life, and accommodation, each receiving a score of 3. Overall, it offers good value for money, indicated by a rating of 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise good professors who care about them and their exceptional knowledge. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campus views and renowned professors. This single review praises the university's aesthetic appeal and academic reputation.

With 3 positive reviews and no negative feedback, students largely highlight excellent educators and admin. Facilities are also frequently praised. The average rating is 3.8/5.

Three positive reviews, averaging 4/5 stars, highlight knowledgeable instructors and valuable training. Students appreciated opportunities to deepen knowledge and develop independence. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
100%
20%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
100%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Academic Disorganization, Well-Prepared Professors

Degree programs could be managed much better; disorganization has a very negative impact on students’ mental health. However, I do recognize the excellent preparation of some professors, so overall I have a neutral opinion of this university.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close