Ibn Zohr University vs ISD Flaubert vs Indonesia Institute of Technology - ITI vs President Ramon Magsaysay State University - PRMSU vs Academy of Fine Arts and Design in Katowice - ASP

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Ibn Zohr University: wins 0/4 categories
ISD Flaubert: wins 0/4 categories
Indonesia Institute of Technology - ITI: wins 0/4 categories
President Ramon Magsaysay State University - PRMSU: wins 0/4 categories
Academy of Fine Arts and Design in Katowice - ASP: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Nacional del Sur - UNS: wins 1/4 categories
Pamulang University - UNPAM: wins 3/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
Rouen, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Informatics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Applied Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.14
Not rated
1.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
3.57
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Professors
3.57
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
2.86
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
2.43
Not rated
1.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
3.71
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.86
Not rated
1.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful and supportive professors
  • +Practical and understandable programs
  • +Value for money

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities and comfortable campus environment
  • +Well-equipped labs and spacious library with good resources
  • +Clean and well-maintained sports areas and student lounges
  • +Tuition-free education and scholarships
  • +Positive and encouraging learning environment
  • +Memorable experiences and personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Rigorous academic standards and prestige
  • +Forefront of research nationwide
  • +Pride in attending a challenging institution
  • +Affordable tuition and high educational quality
  • +Competent and supportive lecturers
  • +Complete campus facilities and dynamic learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of funds and transparency, negatively impact student experience and facilities.
  • -Outdated curriculum and insufficient resources hinder teachers from providing optimal education.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative issues cause frustration.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinders academic progress.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep of campus infrastructure.
  • -Limited course offerings and inflexible academic policies.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are often cited as problems.
  • -Course content and teaching quality can be inconsistent and disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university presents a varied rating profile. The strongest areas are **Value** (3.71), **Professors** (3.57), and **Location** (3.57), indicating positive perceptions in these aspects. Conversely, **Student Life** (2.43) emerges as the weakest area. **Facilities** (3.14) and **Accommodation** (2.86) also fall in the mid-range, with **Internationality** (2.86) performing similarly to accommodation.

Nothing to show

A mixed performance emerges from these university ratings, with notable strengths and significant weaknesses. The institution excels in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are areas of concern, each scoring a low 1. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 3, while the **Value** is rated a respectable 4, suggesting a generally positive return on investment despite specific drawbacks.

This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across most aspects of the student experience. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all received a solid 4 out of 5, indicating a well-rounded and satisfactory environment. The university's strongest area, however, is its value, earning a perfect score of 5. While no areas received low scores, a potential focus for improvement could be further enhancing the already good rating in these key student life categories to achieve a perfect score.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for **Professors** and **Internationality**, and a perfect score for **Value**. Areas with strong positive feedback include **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all receiving a 4. The only area receiving a lower rating, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 3.

Remarkably high scores characterize this university's overall evaluation. It excels in key areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and perceived value, all receiving a perfect five stars. The university's internationality is also strong, though it is the lowest-rated category at four stars. This indicates a generally outstanding and well-rounded educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 43% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills and approachable professors. While ~14% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with resources and facilities, the average rating is 3.43/5.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is praised for its excellent facilities and pleasant campus environment. Negative feedback is absent.

With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights tuition-free education and scholarship assistance as major benefits. This positive feedback suggests a strong sense of pride and financial accessibility for students.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review indicates strong satisfaction. This feedback highlights rigorous academics and prestige, suggesting approximately 100% positive sentiment.

With a single review, this university receives an average rating of 5/5. The ~100% positive feedback highlights excellent educational quality, affordable tuition, competent and supportive lecturers, complete facilities, and a dynamic learning environment.

Rating distribution
5★
14%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
29%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close