Seattle University- Seattle U vs University of Tlemcen vs University Centre of Maghnia vs Istanbul Ticaret University vs National Dong Hwa University

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Seattle University- Seattle U: wins 1/7 categories
University of Tlemcen: wins 0/7 categories
University Centre of Maghnia: wins 0/7 categories
Istanbul Ticaret University: wins 1/7 categories
National Dong Hwa University: wins 5/7 categories
Boland College: wins 0/7 categories
Caraga State University - Carsu: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Seattle, Washington, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Financial Management
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Political Economy
Best programme: International Business
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
1.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.50
3.50
3.00
4.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.50
1.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
4.00
2.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.50
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
4.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty interaction
  • +Prime urban location and access to opportunities
  • +Dedicated student support
  • +Strong academic foundation and preparation for the workforce
  • +Opportunities for supplementary learning through seminars and webinars
  • +Faculty expertise and development of practical skills

Nothing to show

  • +supportive and close-knit student community
  • +limited English-taught courses and Erasmus opportunities for non-English speakers
  • +Flexible, unrestricted program arrangements
  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Beautiful and vibrant campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as not relevant or current.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
  • -Disorganized administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources
  • -Ineffective or irrelevant curriculum and teaching methods

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in its internationality, receiving a perfect score. Facilities and professors are also strong points, both rated at a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.5.

This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its strongest aspects include its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.5, alongside strong **Value** at the same rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also receive solid scores of 4. The **Location** is the weakest area, rated at 3.5.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities** and **location**, both receiving a rating of 4. **Student life** also scores well at 4. Conversely, the **accommodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1. Ratings for **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** are moderate, all sitting at a 3.

This institution receives exceptional ratings for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect 5 out of 5. Internationality is also a strong point at 4. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received a lower score of 2, suggesting this is the weakest aspect of the university's offering.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong academics, student support, and the advantageous urban location. No negative feedback was recorded.

Both reviews are highly positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic successes, knowledgeable faculty, and a curriculum that prepares them for the work field, including useful lab work and skill development.

Nothing to show

This university receives highly positive feedback, with a 4/5 average rating. The small student community and Erasmus opportunities are frequently praised. Turkish is the primary language of instruction, though some English courses are available.

With a 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight flexible programs and friendly professors. The large, beautiful campus with vibrant flora and fauna is also praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close