Ibn Zohr University vs Saint Leo University vs EMAA Business School vs Stikes Nani Hasanuddin - Stikes Nani Hasanuddin vs Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS (5.00)
Ibn Zohr University: wins 0/6 categories
Saint Leo University: wins 0/6 categories
EMAA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Stikes Nani Hasanuddin - Stikes Nani Hasanuddin : wins 0/6 categories
Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS: wins 6/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
St. Leo, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Agadir, Morocco
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Assistance and Philosophy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.14
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.57
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.57
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.86
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
2.43
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.71
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.86
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful and supportive professors
  • +Practical and understandable programs
  • +Value for money
  • +Close-knit community and supportive atmosphere.
  • +High-quality, engaging professors and helpful staff.
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment for all.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, skill-building experience and qualified instructors
  • +Well-structured program balancing theory and practice
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of funds and transparency, negatively impact student experience and facilities.
  • -Outdated curriculum and insufficient resources hinder teachers from providing optimal education.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of adequate support and engagement from instructors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university presents a varied rating profile. The strongest areas are **Value** (3.71), **Professors** (3.57), and **Location** (3.57), indicating positive perceptions in these aspects. Conversely, **Student Life** (2.43) emerges as the weakest area. **Facilities** (3.14) and **Accommodation** (2.86) also fall in the mid-range, with **Internationality** (2.86) performing similarly to accommodation.

This institution scores exceptionally well in student life and internationality, boasting the highest ratings in these areas. Professors and the university's value are also highly regarded. The weakest area appears to be facilities, receiving the lowest score. Location and accommodation are rated positively, indicating a generally favorable overall university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution achieves near-perfect scores across most surveyed areas, excelling in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The sole area showing a slight dip, though still strong, is Accomodation, rated at a commendable 4. Overall, the university presents a robust and highly-rated educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 43% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills and approachable professors. While ~14% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with resources and facilities, the average rating is 3.43/5.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight excellent professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and enjoyable campus activities as key strengths.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This reflects ~100% positive feedback, highlighting a well-structured program, qualified instructors, and beneficial clinical placements.

Rating distribution
5★
14%
50%
0%
0%
100%
4★
29%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close