University of British Columbia vs Lighthouse Labs vs LaSalle College Vancouver vs Acsenda School of Management vs VanWest College
Side-by-side comparison from 197 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning opportunities
- +Abundant resources, study spaces, and campus support services
Nothing to show
- +Experienced faculty and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and equipment
- +Commitment to diversity and inclusion
- +Accessible, friendly, and helpful staff
- +Relevant, applicable, and expert instruction from passionate professors
- +Convenient downtown Vancouver location
- +Supportive and professional instructors and advisors
- +Creative teaching approach and personalized attention
- +Close-knit and supportive campus environment
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Practical co-op experiences
- +Convenient downtown location & strong security
- +Engaging & clear teaching with examples
- +Opportunities for participation & creative freedom
- -Administrative & course selection issues are frustrating.
- -Social life can feel superficial and exclusive.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some professors subpar.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The teaching quality and course content often fall short of expectations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -A lack of engaging teaching methods and clear communication is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated and inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -Administrative issues and poor communication are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes seen as lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and learning resources is problematic.
This institution's surveyed areas reveal a mixed performance. The strongest aspects are Location, scoring 4.45, closely followed by Internationality at 4.35 and Student Life at 4.31. Facilities also received a commendable 4.22 rating. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.86, while Professors and Value fall within the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution garners particularly strong ratings in **Internationality (5)**, indicating a well-developed global presence. **Facilities** and **Location** also score highly at 4. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, rated only 1.5. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all sit in the mid-range, with scores of 3.5, 3, and 3.5 respectively.
This institution garners exceptional marks in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving perfect scores. Its **internationality** and **value** are also highly commendable. Conversely, **facilities** and **accommodation** represent the areas with the most room for improvement, though still scoring respectably.
This institution demonstrates a notably strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are identified as the weakest areas, each scoring a 3. The university also received solid ratings for its **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4), with **Internationality** and **Value** falling in the mid-range.
Remarkably high scores characterize this institution, with exceptional ratings of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. These areas represent the university's strongest points. Conversely, the Accomodation rating of 3 indicates a relative weakness, while the Value score of 4 suggests a generally positive but not outstanding offering in that regard.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **facilities, location, student life, and internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Professors and accommodation are also highly rated at 4. The only area receiving a slightly lower score, though still strong, is **value**, rated at 4. Overall, it presents a very positive picture for prospective students.
With 4.23/5 stars from 191 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics, professors, and resources. Negative feedback, representing about 1.1%, mentions course selection difficulties and inconsistent professor quality.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight experienced faculty and modern facilities as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback being 4–5 stars. Students highlight friendly and helpful staff, as well as professors' passion and relevant teaching.
With one positive review out of two, approximately 50% of feedback highlights a supportive campus environment and creative instructors. The average rating is 3.5/5, with no negative reviews.
The sole review is highly positive (5/5), praising the Applied Communications course for being helpful to responsible, self-driven students with clear goals. Teachers are noted as very supportive.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise convenient downtown location, strong security, engaging professors, and opportunities for participation and creativity. No negative feedback was recorded.
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
