Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs Drohobych State Pedagogical University of Ivan Franko - DSPU vs University for Foreigners of Siena – International University vs Davangere University vs Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK: wins 1/3 categories
Drohobych State Pedagogical University of Ivan Franko - DSPU: wins 0/3 categories
University for Foreigners of Siena – International University: wins 0/3 categories
Davangere University: wins 2/3 categories
Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women: wins 0/3 categories
Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Sciences and Technology - QUEST: wins 0/3 categories
Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Cultural Mediation
Tholahunase, India
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Mathematics and Computer Science
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: B.Sc. in Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
Not rated
3.20
5.00
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.17
Not rated
3.80
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.33
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.17
Not rated
3.60
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.67
Not rated
4.00
5.00
1.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
2.80
4.00
1.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
  • +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
  • +Competent and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive student and peer relationships
  • +Good quality hostel accommodation
  • +Excellent, trained, and available faculty
  • +Diverse and relevant course offerings
  • +Opportunities for specialized learning
  • +Experienced, friendly lecturers and excellent education.
  • +Well-maintained facilities.
  • +Talented and helpful faculty
  • +Good campus environment
  • +Scholarship opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Responsive communication and problem resolution
  • +Seamless administrative support for focused study
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
  • -Inconsistent and unresponsive administrative support causes significant frustration.
  • -Lack of engagement and clear communication from management is a recurring issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Unclear communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are consistently criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring problem.
  • -Ineffective teaching and a lack of engaging curriculum are frequently criticized.
  • -Students experience significant administrative and management issues.
Rating summary
What students say

The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.

Performance across all surveyed categories remains at a standstill, with no discernible strengths or weaknesses emerging. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, registers a neutral rating of zero. This consistent score across the board indicates an area with significant room for development and improvement in all examined facets.

This university performs exceptionally well in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores of 4. **Value** also matches this high standard. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.8. Other aspects like **Professors** (3.8) and **Student Life** (3.6) are rated positively, while **Facilities** (3.2) is a moderate area.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a perfect score. Accomodation and Location also score well, indicating solid offerings in these areas. The university also demonstrates excellent Value, with a 5-star rating.

A mixed performance is evident in these university ratings. The institution excels in its professor quality, achieving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses emerge in its location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all receiving the lowest possible rating. Facilities and student life also fall short with low scores, indicating areas needing substantial improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in Facilities and Value, both earning perfect scores, indicating a high-quality experience and excellent return on investment. Student Life, Professors, and Location are all solid, scoring a respectable 4 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation and Internationality, which received a moderate 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise competent professors and engaging lectures, though some mention outdated programs. Hostel conditions are generally positive, but one review noted inadequate furnishings.

Students are highly satisfied with the university's diverse and current language programs, as well as the highly competent and available faculty. The small class sizes foster strong student-teacher interaction.

The sole reviewer awarded a 5/5 rating, expressing satisfaction with experienced lecturers and excellent education. Positive feedback highlights good class conditions and friendly lecturers. There are no negative reviews.

This university has one positive review, rating it 5/5. Students praise its welcoming environment for women, talented faculty, and scholarship opportunities.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Students praise easy communication and practical problem-solving.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
100%
40%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
14%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
57%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close