University of Crete - UOC vs University of San Diego vs Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella vs University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad vs School of Electrical and Energetic Engineering of Oran

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad (4.50)
University of Crete - UOC: wins 0/7 categories
University of San Diego: wins 0/7 categories
Université Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella: wins 0/7 categories
University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed - Bediaf ryad: wins 2/7 categories
School of Electrical and Energetic Engineering of Oran: wins 0/7 categories
University of Science and Technology Mohamed Boudiaf - Usto-MB: wins 0/7 categories
United International University: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
San Diego, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Educational Psychology
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.65
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Location
3.65
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Professors
4.18
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Internationality
2.88
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.25
Student life
3.71
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Value
3.94
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.25
Accommodation
2.44
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
1.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
  • +Opportunities for interdisciplinary study and research
  • +High academic standards and excellent facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and dedicated faculty
  • +Strong academic programs and learning opportunities
  • +Fostering autonomy and lifelong learning

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant, job-market-aligned course content
  • +Opportunities for projects, funding, and international study
  • +Affordable tuition and supportive student-teacher relationships
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves its highest marks in professor quality, with a rating of 4.18. Value for money also scores well at 3.94. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving a low rating of 2.44. Internationality and facilities are mid-range at 2.88 and 3.65 respectively, while student life sits at 3.71.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its high rating for **Internationality**, earning a perfect score. Overall, facilities, professors, location, student life, and value are all highly regarded. The weakest area, though still respectable, is accommodation, which received a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives consistently strong evaluations, with its facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning an impressive 4.5 out of 5. Accommodation and internationality are also rated favorably at 4 and 4.25 respectively. The university's value for money is similarly well-regarded at 4.25, indicating a solid overall offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~82% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.24/5, students praise knowledgeable and helpful faculty, diverse course options, and good research opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is ~100% positive. Students praise excellent professors and a commitment to maximizing learning opportunities and fostering autonomy.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting well-organized course outlines, job market relevance, project opportunities, and scholarships. Students also praise the welcoming environment and strong student-teacher relationships.

Rating distribution
5★
42%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
25%
4★
39%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
75%
3★
18%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great experience in general, still things to improve.

I’m an undergraduate student of Applied Mathematics. After years on the campus, I’ve liked the facilities a lot, and I think they’re the best in the country. I’ve also liked the knowledge coverage that the studies offer on the subject. The help from the profs is mixed. Some are helpful and nice but many deliver an impersonal way of teaching so students are left filling their blanks by themselves. The organizing of exams could be better if students and profs could find the best dates on the calendar without making it every-day-examine sometimes which can be stressful. Finally, some of the first subjects that you have to take are very crowded and students tend to sit by the back without a seat or being left out.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close