Université de la Polynésie française - UPF vs Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University - LNMU vs Screen and Film School - SAFSB vs Kohat University of Science and Technology - KUST vs Air University Islamabad
Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teachers and engaging teaching methods
- +Strong sense of community and friendships
- +Good living conditions and social events
- +Supportive community and networking opportunities
- +Inspiring and collaborative learning environment
- +Professional and personal growth
- +Affordable education
- +Platform for learning different skills and research
- +Cooperative faculty & student-centric feedback
- +Practical, real-world application of learning
- +Strong, modern curriculum with specialized programs
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated educational system and ill-considered practical classes.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading, often influenced by personal motives or connections.
- -Lack of professionalism and insufficient numbers of qualified teachers.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency create uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration and delays.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hindered learning.
- -Lack of engaging content and relevant learning materials was a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a major concern.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners significant praise for its accommodations and professor quality, both receiving top marks. Areas for improvement include its facilities, internationality, and location, all rated at a moderate level. Student life and overall value are considered strong points, reflecting a positive student experience.
This institution boasts outstanding strengths in **Location**, receiving a perfect score. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both earning a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest areas, each scoring a 2. **Professors** and **Value** fall in the middle ground with average ratings of 3.
Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas are its professors and accommodation, both receiving 4.5 out of 5. Facilities, student life, and internationality are also well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. The location, however, stands out as a relatively weaker point with a rating of 3.5. Value for money is also rated favorably at 4.
Academically and experientially, the university receives strong marks. Professors are highly rated at 4.33, closely followed by location at 4.25 and value at 4.11. Facilities also score well with a 4. Student life, while decent at 3.78, is a relative area for improvement, and accommodation at 3.22 and internationality at 3.33 are the lowest-scoring aspects.
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
About 50% of reviews praise the university atmosphere, supportive teachers, and city, while a small percentage of feedback (around 9%) cites issues like lack of practice and corruption.
Based on one review with a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight opportunities for professional and personal growth, meeting like-minded individuals, and an inspiring, collaborative atmosphere.
With an average rating of 4/5, the university is positively reviewed (~100% positive feedback). Students highlight affordable education and a platform for skill development and research.
With ~89% positive sentiment, students praise cooperative faculty and practical learning, highlighting opportunities for academic and personal growth. A small amount of feedback (~11%) did not contain negative comments.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If be really honest our medical university has many different problems. But I want to start from pluses: first - if you want to study- you may do it, second - most of the teachers are really good, third - there are just two pluses:))) Minuses- 1) the greatest problem is that you haven't any practice (except some rare cases). 2) low level of English 3) you have no chance to choose what you prefer to study 4) corruption (sometimes your ratings do not depend on you)
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show