Clausthal University of Technology vs Centre for Alternative Technology vs University of Economics in Bratislava vs Loyola College vs Matej Bel University

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Clausthal University of Technology: wins 0/3 categories
Centre for Alternative Technology: wins 0/3 categories
University of Economics in Bratislava: wins 0/3 categories
Loyola College: wins 0/3 categories
Matej Bel University: wins 2/3 categories
Fundação Escola de Sociologia e Política de São Paulo - FESPSP: wins 0/3 categories
Islamic University of Technology - IUT: wins 1/3 categories
Comparing
Wales, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration and Management
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.60
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.13
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.33
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.13
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
3.47
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Wide program selection in the capital.
  • +Progressive teaching methods used by some instructors.
  • +Business Management program valued for practical usefulness.
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Supportive and helpful teachers
  • +Interesting, real-world relevant study programmes
  • +Welcoming environment for international students and ample social opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Global exposure and strong peer quality
  • +Supportive faculty and community
  • +Excellent career outcomes and alumni network
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Unengaging and outdated academic content.
  • -Lack of practical application and international opportunities.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff cause frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Performance is particularly strong in location, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas needing significant improvement, indicated by lower scores. Overall, the university presents a mixed profile with average ratings in facilities, professors, student life, and value.

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution boasts exceptional ratings across most key aspects, with perfect scores awarded for facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation. Its internationality also scores highly at 4.5, indicating a well-rounded and desirable university experience. The sole area not receiving a top score is internationality, though it remains a strong point.

Nothing to show

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive marks, excelling particularly in its **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value**, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, though still strong, is the **professors**, rated at four. The **location** also garnered a solid four.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews are split, with a 3/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, highlighting a need for modernized teaching and more practical, international projects. Positive comments mention the capital location and program variety.

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with all reviews giving a 5-star rating. Students praise the supportive environment and helpful faculty, as well as engaging study programs.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight global exposure, strong peer quality, and excellent career outcomes. A sense of community and supportive faculty are also recurring themes.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
53%
100%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
50%
40%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close