Universidad Mayor de San Simón - UMSS vs Universidad Adventista de Bolivia - UAB vs The College of Idaho vs Lander University vs Bolivian Private University - UPB

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Donetsk National Technical University - DonNTU (5.00)
Universidad Mayor de San Simón - UMSS: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Adventista de Bolivia - UAB: wins 0/6 categories
The College of Idaho: wins 1/6 categories
Lander University: wins 2/6 categories
Bolivian Private University - UPB: wins 0/6 categories
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Inelec: wins 0/6 categories
Donetsk National Technical University - DonNTU: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Education Management
Caldwell, Idaho, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Greenwood, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Communication Studies
Best programme: Construction Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
3.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
2.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong business administration programs with theoretical and practical balance.
  • +Expert professors with academic and industry experience.
  • +Impactful professional development.

Nothing to show

  • +Close professor interaction due to small class sizes
  • +Excellent preparation for graduate studies
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Personalized learning and small class sizes
  • +Emphasis on practical, hands-on experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong career foundation from degree programs.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from staff is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course material.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is frequently criticized.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves a very positive overall rating. Its strongest areas are **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Areas like **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** are solid, with a rating of 4 out of 5. **Professors** also earned a strong 4, indicating a well-rounded university experience with excellent infrastructure and prime placement.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors**, earning a perfect score, and also scores highly for **facilities** and **accommodation**. Student life, however, is identified as the weakest area with a score of 2.5. While location and internationality are rated moderately, the overall value for money is considered good.

This university presents a strong profile, excelling particularly in its **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving an impressive 4.5. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life** also scored highly at 4. Areas with moderate scores include **Location** and **Accomodation**, each rated at 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Facilities and professors are also highly regarded, both earning a 4 out of 5. Conversely, internationality is a notable area for improvement, rated at 2. Location stands out as the weakest aspect, with a rating of 0. Accommodation and overall value received moderate scores of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, ~50% of feedback is positive. Students highlight impactful professional development and strong foundational knowledge in Business Administration. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights the benefits of a small college size, fostering professor interaction and aiding graduate school preparation. No negative feedback was provided.

Both reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight great professors and a well-organized university, emphasizing helpfulness and student success. A positive personalized learning experience and hands-on experience were also noted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights the university's strong foundation for careers, specifically mentioning success in securing employment after a Construction Engineering degree.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
50%
50%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close