University of Nairobi vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Strathmore University - SU vs Africa Nazarene University vs KIRIRI Women's University of Science and Technology - KWUST

Side-by-side comparison from 254 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Nairobi: wins 0/6 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 1/6 categories
Strathmore University - SU: wins 0/6 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 1/6 categories
KIRIRI Women's University of Science and Technology - KWUST: wins 0/6 categories
Kaimosi Friends University - KAFU : wins 4/6 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.00
4.74
4.67
4.67
5.00
Win
3.75
Location
4.61
4.67
Win
4.53
4.00
3.33
3.00
4.00
Professors
4.38
4.33
4.42
4.33
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.18
3.67
4.63
4.67
2.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Student life
4.21
4.33
4.63
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
2.75
Value
4.40
4.00
4.63
4.67
4.67
4.00
4.25
Accommodation
3.75
4.00
3.89
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
2.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and employability.
  • +Quality of teaching and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers.
  • +Convenient location and diverse learning environment.
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.
  • +Professionalism and discipline emphasized.
  • +High-quality education and academic excellence.
  • +Global exposure and valuable learning experiences.
  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
  • +Empowering and supportive academic environment
  • +Personalized attention and approachable lecturers
  • +Strong focus on key disciplines for women
  • +Strong IT and technology programs
  • +Knowledgeable professors and good facilities
  • +Interest in career and industry preparation
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes
Cons
  • -Overcrowding negatively impacts the learning environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure need improvement.
  • -Overemphasis on theory neglects practical skills development.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of support for learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, the university demonstrates a generally strong performance. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, receiving a score of 4.61. Professors and value also score highly, both above 4.39. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.75. Other categories like facilities, student life, and internationality fall within a solid mid-range, all exceeding 4.0.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

This university receives strong marks across multiple aspects of student experience. Its facilities and internationality are particularly well-regarded, both scoring 4.63. Student life and value for money also achieve this same high rating. Professors and location are rated favorably as well. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a lower score of 3.89.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving outstanding scores. Student life and accommodation are also rated positively. However, the university's location receives a moderate rating, and its internationality is a noted area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its **facilities, professors, and accommodation**. Student life and overall value are also strong at 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **location** received the lowest rating, scoring a 3. Internationality is another area of strength, also rated at 5.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Nairobi reviews are overwhelmingly positive (90.5%), highlighting strong academic prestige, employability, and faculty quality. Minor criticisms (~1.4%) include overcrowding and infrastructure needs.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

With an average rating of 4.68/5 from 19 reviews, ~95% of feedback is positive. Students praise professionalism, skill development, and quality education, with discipline and mentorship highlighted. No negative reviews were provided.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4/5, students praise Kiriri Women's University for its supportive and empowering academic environment. Lecturers are described as approachable and knowledgeable, fostering personalized attention and growth.

This university receives strong positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight the IT program's solid foundation, knowledgeable professors, and well-equipped labs.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
67%
74%
67%
0%
0%
25%
4★
37%
33%
21%
33%
100%
100%
50%
3★
8%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
25%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A Solid Foundation for a Career in Travel Tourism.

I started my Bachelor of Arts in Travel and Tourism at the University of Nairobi in 2015. The program gave me a solid foundation for understanding how the tourism and travel industry works, both locally and internationally. The coursework explored important areas like tourism management, destination development, and sustainable tourism. Through these subjects, I developed a deeper appreciation for how tourism drives economic growth and fosters cultural exchange. The lectures were not only knowledgeable but also genuinely supportive, often going the extra mile to mentor students beyond the classroom. Being in Nairobi was a real advantage. We had direct exposure to a vibrant tourism sector and a variety of industry stakeholders, which made learning much more practical and meaningful. Although some administrative processes could be a bit slow at times, my overall academic experience was truly rewarding. I recommend this program to anyone interested in building a career in the tourism and travel industry.

Nothing to show

professionalism

Strathmore University is indeed widely regarded as one of the top private universities in Kenya, especially for its focus on professionalism, discipline, and quality education. Its reputation for academic excellence, especially in business, law, and technology, has made it a preferred choice for many students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close