University of Balamand - UOB vs Kathmandu University vs Nova Scotia Community College - NSCC vs Universitas Sam Ratulangi - UNSRAT vs SMK St. George, Taiping

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Balamand - UOB (4.50)
University of Balamand - UOB: wins 1/6 categories
Kathmandu University: wins 1/6 categories
Nova Scotia Community College - NSCC: wins 3/6 categories
Universitas Sam Ratulangi - UNSRAT: wins 1/6 categories
SMK St. George, Taiping: wins 0/6 categories
Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic State University of Bandung - UIN SGD: wins 0/6 categories
ID Digital School - ID Digital School: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Dhulikhel, Nepal
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: Digital Technology
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Taiping, Malaysia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.50
4.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.75
3.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.25
4.50
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.75
Win
3.00
3.25
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
3.50
4.75
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.25
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
2.50
3.75
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional professors and rigorous academic programs
  • +Comprehensive and holistic education
  • +Strong foundation and helpful faculty
  • +Excellent, updated curriculum and faculty.
  • +Supportive learning environment and career support.
  • +Strong infrastructure and technology access.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors with real-world experience.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning connecting theory to applications.
  • +Accessible and affordable tuition with financial aid options.
  • +Community building and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world learning experiences
  • +Supportive and effective teaching staff

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and poor organization lead to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors and perceived value**, both scoring 4.25. Student life also garners a strong 4. The weakest areas are **facilities and accommodation**, each receiving a 3.5 rating. Location and internationality are rated at a respectable 3.75.

Academic strengths shine through, with professors receiving an excellent 4.5 rating and value for money also scoring highly at 4.5. Facilities and student life are solid at 3.5, while location and internationality are rated a respectable 3. The primary area for improvement lies with accommodation, which received the lowest score of 2.5.

This institution receives a highly positive overall rating, with exceptional scores for its **Location** (5) and **Student Life** (4.75). Professors are also well-regarded at 4.25. Areas with room for improvement include **Accomodation** (3.75) and **Internationality** (3.25), which represent the weakest aspects of the university experience according to these ratings.

With a standout score of 5 for both Professors and Location, this university excels in academic quality and its advantageous setting. Student Life also garners strong marks at 4.5. However, Internationality presents a notable weakness with a score of 2.5. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately at 3.5, while Value is positive at 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.5/5 average rating from four reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight excellent, intelligent professors and rigorous academic programs. One review noted a lack of lab materials and limited major options at a specific branch.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise excellent faculty, updated syllabi, and engaging learning environments, despite one mention of campus distance from the city. Management is noted as an area for improvement.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~75% of feedback rating the university highly. Students praise well-delivered programs, supportive and experienced instructors, and manageable coursework. A minor point suggests more career services.

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, approximately 50% are positive. Students highlighted positive campus culture and engaging professors. There is no negative feedback reported.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
100%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
25%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close