Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs University of Galway vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ICD Business School Dublin
Side-by-side comparison from 112 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
- +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
- +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
- +Supportive and engaging faculty
- +Vibrant campus life and location
- +Excellent academic programs and facilities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Expert faculty and supportive environment
- +Modern facilities and accommodation
- +Small class sizes and supportive, helpful faculty.
- +Practical and in-depth course structures with hands-on learning.
- +Vibrant campus life and inclusive, diverse environment.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
- -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging content and effective teaching methods are noted.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors**, with a rating of 4.41. **Value** and **location** also stand out positively, both scoring above 4.18. **Student life** and **internationality** are well-regarded, while **facilities** are rated solidly at 4.06. The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is **accommodation** at 3.56.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution scores exceptionally well in student life and internationality, both earning a high 4.5. Its location is also a significant strength at 4.25. Areas receiving a solid rating include facilities, accommodation, and value, all at 4. Professors represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, with an average rating of 3.75.
With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.
With ~93% positive reviews and an average of 4.1/5, students highlight supportive atmospheres, engaging lecturers, and vibrant campus life. Modern facilities and challenging academics are frequently praised.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.
Students report a highly positive experience, praising small class sizes, strong faculty support, and vibrant campus life. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative, with no negative reviews recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
