London School of Commerce - LSC vs St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC vs RV University vs ISBR Business School vs Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bengaluru City University (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
St Joseph's College of Commerce - SJCC: wins 0/7 categories
RV University: wins 0/7 categories
ISBR Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore: wins 0/7 categories
Garden City University - GCU: wins 0/7 categories
Bengaluru City University: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: BCom
Bangalore, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Bangalore, India
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Master in Management
Best programme: Nursing
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Work
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.75
4.75
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
3.25
4.25
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Student life
3.75
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
2.75
4.50
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Excellent faculty and subject knowledge
  • +Valuable real-world exposure and opportunities
  • +Supportive and familial campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +strong academics and professors
  • +engaging extracurriculars for portfolio building
  • +memorable campus life

Nothing to show

  • +Inclusive and considerate learning environment
  • +Balanced academic and extracurricular focus
  • +Balance of theory and practical knowledge
  • +Real-world experience and skill development
  • +Enriching exposure and rich learning
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Disappointing facilities and learning resources are a common complaint.
  • -Issues with administrative processes and communication cause significant frustration.
  • -Inflexible policies and a lack of responsiveness from staff are frequently criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning and student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution excels in its location and student life, both receiving top marks. Facilities and professors are also highly rated. However, accommodation presents a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower. Internationality is moderately rated, while the value proposition is strong.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with its vibrant **Student Life** standing out as its strongest asset. **Professors** and **Location** also receive excellent marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, which, while solid, are rated slightly lower than other aspects. The university demonstrates a good international presence and offers good value.

Nothing to show

With impressive scores in internationality and value, this institution excels in attracting global students and offering a worthwhile experience. However, the university's weakest areas lie in its location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving zero ratings. Facilities and professors are rated moderately at three stars.

Exceptional scores distinguish this institution, particularly in its outstanding **facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value**, all receiving a perfect five. The only area not reaching maximum is **student life**, which scored a strong four. Overall, the university presents a highly commendable academic and practical environment, with its academic offerings and resources standing out as particularly robust.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, nearly 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable faculty, strong networking, and valuable real-world exposure. Some mention overcrowding and suggest syllabus improvements.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating, the 2 reviews highlight strong academics and cherished campus life. Placements are a noted challenge. Negative feedback is minimal.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the university's diversity, thoughtfulness in considering students, and the balance between academics and extracurriculars.

With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights an enriching experience with a good balance of theory and practical knowledge, including valuable fieldwork placements.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
25%
50%
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close