Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs Harbour.Space University vs Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology - JOOUST vs Atlantic Technological University - ATU vs Oakwood University - OU
Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Instruction from experienced industry professionals and global leaders
- +Collaborative and supportive learning environment
- +Conducive learning environment and dedicated, supportive lecturers
- +Rigorous academic programs with a comprehensive, practical curriculum
- +Vibrant student life and timely administrative processes
- +Small class sizes and supportive, helpful faculty.
- +Practical and in-depth course structures with hands-on learning.
- +Vibrant campus life and inclusive, diverse environment.
- +Supportive, individual-focused community and small class sizes
- +Faith-based, family-oriented atmosphere
- +Flexible online lectures and self-paced learning
- +Affordability and recognized accreditation
- +Online program and remote learning access
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Lack of intellectual rigor and outdated educational approach.
- -Disconnect between marketing and actual industry relevance.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from administration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Limited support and insufficient faculty availability.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging content and effective teaching methods are noted.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -A lack of necessary resources and support significantly hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Overcrowding and limited access to essential services cause considerable dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
This institution excels in several key areas, with **Internationality** receiving a perfect score. **Location** and **Student Life** are also highly rated, closely followed by **Professors**. **Facilities** and **Value** are strong, while **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-scoring aspect.
This university garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in Student Life and Value, both scoring close to a perfect 5. Professors also receive very high marks. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, which received the lowest rating, along with Location and Accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.
This institution scores exceptionally well in student life and internationality, both earning a high 4.5. Its location is also a significant strength at 4.25. Areas receiving a solid rating include facilities, accommodation, and value, all at 4. Professors represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, with an average rating of 3.75.
A generally strong performance is indicated by the university's ratings. Professors, student life, internationality, and overall value received perfect scores of 5. Facilities and location also earned high marks at 4. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 3.
This institution excels in its facilities, receiving a perfect score. Location is another strong point, rated highly at 4.67. Student life, however, is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Accommodations and value for money are also well-regarded, both at 4.33. Ratings for professors and internationality are moderate, around 3.67.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
Most (~95%) reviews are positive, highlighting practical, project-based learning from industry professionals and a collaborative atmosphere. One review found the program too easy.
With a 4.57/5 average, ~100% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence, dedicated lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. A minor negative mention highlights manual operations and some issues with online unit marks.
Students report a highly positive experience, praising small class sizes, strong faculty support, and vibrant campus life. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative, with no negative reviews recorded.
With an average rating of 4/5, the sole review highlights a supportive community and individual attention, particularly beneficial for international students. No negative feedback was received.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise flexibility in scheduling, affordability, and the convenience of online lectures. Some mention a desire for fully remote exams.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Harbour Space was an overall enriching and positive experience. The majority of the instructors were exceptional, providing invaluable knowledge and insights that significantly enhanced my learning journey. While the program delivered on many fronts, there were some areas where it fell short. Specifically, the promise of investors backing our ideas was not fully realized, and the networking events, although present, lacked the depth and engagement needed to forge meaningful connections. Despite these shortcomings, the education and experience gained were highly valuable.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show