East Delta University - EDU vs Chattogram Medical College vs Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology - CUET vs University of Science and Technology Chittagong vs BGC Trust University Bangladesh

Side-by-side comparison from 104 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: East Delta University - EDU (4.10)
East Delta University - EDU: wins 2/5 categories
Chattogram Medical College: wins 0/5 categories
Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology - CUET: wins 0/5 categories
University of Science and Technology Chittagong: wins 3/5 categories
BGC Trust University Bangladesh: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Chittagong, Bangladesh
4.10
Top
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Chittagong, Bangladesh
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Biochemistry and Biotechnology
Chittagong, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.57
Win
4.00
3.52
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.00
2.00
3.19
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.71
1.00
3.92
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.57
Win
1.00
3.18
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.50
5.00
4.03
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.43
1.00
3.99
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
5.00
4.05
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Engaging campus with amenities and clubs
  • +Skill development and confidence building
  • +Engaging instructors & clear teaching
  • +Relevant curriculum & practical skills
  • +Supportive community & vibrant campus life
  • +Excellent educational environment and dedicated faculty.
  • +High-speed internet in residences is a welcome improvement.
  • +Fosters personal growth and discipline despite academic pressure.
  • +hands-on learning opportunities
  • +qualified instructors
  • +strong science and medical programmes

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are disappointing.
  • -Poor communication and a disconnect with instructors are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Inadequate student support services and poor communication are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated academic environment, rules, and teaching approaches.
  • -Ineffective instructors and mismatched syllabus for assessments.
  • -Strict attendance policies coupled with monotonous and unengaging sessions.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management hinder academic progress.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources create a challenging learning environment.
  • -Inflexible policies and a perceived lack of student support negatively impact the overall experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student life aspects of the university received high marks, with Professors and Facilities standing out at approximately 4.7 and 4.6 respectively. Internationality also scored well at 4.6. Location and Accommodation were rated at a solid 4, representing the lower end of the overall positive spectrum, while Value earned a strong 4.4.

Performance in the surveyed categories reveals a distinct split. The university excels in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, significant weaknesses are evident in the professor quality, internationality, and value, all of which are rated as 1. Facilities are moderately rated at 4, while location received a lower score of 2.

Student life and accommodation stand out as particularly strong aspects of this university, both scoring above 4.0. Professors and value for money also receive high marks, nearing the 4.0 threshold. Conversely, facilities and internationality are the lowest-rated areas, while location also shows room for improvement.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, particularly in its professors, location, student life, accommodation, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly rated, scoring a 4. The university presents a very strong overall profile, with no significant weak areas identified.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.14/5. Students praise the campus beauty, faculty, and available amenities. Some mention a desire for more research opportunities.

Based on the single review provided, which is negative (1/5 stars), the feedback indicates significant dissatisfaction. The review, representing ~100% of the feedback, highlights a negative experience.

Roughly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting educational facilities and a strong academic culture. A small percentage of negative feedback points to issues with residency facilities and some instructors' teaching approaches.

This university garners a highly positive reception (~100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise excellent learning experiences in physical sciences and medicine, facilitated by qualified instructors and research hospital access.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
0%
32%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
41%
100%
0%
3★
43%
0%
22%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1★
0%
100%
1%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close