Beykent University vs Texas A&M - TAMU vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal - SVKM vs Hellenic American College - HAEC vs Faculty of Pharmacy of Algiers - FPA
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Top-tier finance and accounting programs.
- +Excellent social opportunities.
- +Central Istanbul location.
- +Strong community and connections
- +Quality academics and professors
- +Abundant activities and traditions
- +Excellent faculty and well-designed curriculum
- +Opportunities for student growth and participation in activities
- +Focus on student welfare and comprehensive education
Nothing to show
- +Engaging professors and interesting subject matter
- +Comprehensive practical experience across subjects
- +High academic standards and precise attention to detail
- +Supportive and understanding professors
- +Innovative learning environment and future-ready skills
- +Modern facilities and effective teaching methods
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of concern for educational services is noted.
- -Financial focus and issues with international student admissions are concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and course structure causes confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated curriculum are disliked.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are significant drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks for its faculty, this institution shines in teaching quality. However, prospective students may find its location and student life less appealing, receiving the lowest scores in these areas. Accommodation and facilities are rated moderately, offering a decent experience. The university presents a mixed picture, with academic strengths overshadowed by shortcomings in campus experience and accessibility.
This institution is highly regarded across several key areas, excelling particularly in Student Life (4.45) and Value (4.42). Internationality also received a strong score (4.32). The university demonstrates good performance in Facilities (4.26) and Professors (4.26), with Accomodation also scoring well (4.1). Location, while still positive, is the weakest rated aspect among the surveyed categories (3.84).
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, location, and internationality. Student life and overall value are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a comparatively lower rating. Facilities are rated well but not exceptionally.
Nothing to show
This institution excels significantly in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are notable weaknesses, each rated at the lowest possible score. Student life is moderately rated, while the overall value proposition receives a below-average score.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff and vibrant student life, both earning a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4, as does its international appeal and overall value. The university's location receives the lowest mark at 3.5, representing its primary area for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Reviews are mixed, with a ~33% rating of 1-2 stars and a ~33% rating of 4-5 stars. Positive feedback highlights strong finance/accounting faculty and social opportunities. Negative comments focus on understaffing and poor communication, particularly for international students.
With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise strong professor and peer connections, a friendly community, and the Aggie Network. Some mention needing to actively search for assistance. No 1-2 star reviews were present.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these reviews highlight a positive student experience. The feedback praises excellent faculty, a strong curriculum, and supportive infrastructure, contributing to ~100% positive sentiment.
Nothing to show
With a single review and an average rating of 5/5, this university garners ~100% positive feedback. The student highlighted engaging professors and a fascinating, practical pharmacy curriculum.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 2 positive reviews highlight faculty support and innovative programs. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
I was registered at the beykent university and I am an international student . The university is understaffed and they do not have good communication or do not have the capability to respond to emails . they do not care about educational sevices . The university focuses on payments and unlike others they asked payments for the whole year . they do not evaluate the certificates for international admissions and accept them easily after receiving money . so the international students go to the university and had to leave after not receiving equivalency certificates . they do not refund and that’s the gambling business the university is carrying out . 0 stars
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
