Beykent University vs Texas A&M - TAMU vs Hellenic American College - HAEC vs University Centre Sparsholt - UCS vs Universidade Aberta - UAb

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculty of Pharmacy of Algiers - FPA (5.00)
Beykent University: wins 0/6 categories
Texas A&M - TAMU: wins 5/6 categories
Hellenic American College - HAEC: wins 0/6 categories
University Centre Sparsholt - UCS: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Aberta - UAb: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Pharmacy of Algiers - FPA: wins 1/6 categories
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Inelec: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Istanbul, Turkey
3.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
College Station, Texas, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Winchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Doctor of Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
4.26
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Location
2.00
3.84
Not rated
Not rated
4.10
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
5.00
4.26
Not rated
Not rated
4.23
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
1.50
4.32
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.15
1.00
Not rated
Student life
2.00
4.42
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.42
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.38
2.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
4.11
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.89
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Top-tier finance and accounting programs.
  • +Excellent social opportunities.
  • +Central Istanbul location.
  • +Strong community and connections
  • +Quality academics and professors
  • +Abundant activities and traditions

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities, well-located campus, and a strong sense of community.
  • +Flexible distance learning model with high academic quality and well-qualified faculty.
  • +Practical and professional focus in programs, preparing students for the future.
  • +Engaging professors and interesting subject matter
  • +Comprehensive practical experience across subjects
  • +High academic standards and precise attention to detail

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
  • -Lack of concern for educational services is noted.
  • -Financial focus and issues with international student admissions are concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and course structure causes confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are often criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are sometimes seen as ineffective or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are significant drawbacks.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With exceptional marks for its faculty, this institution shines in teaching quality. However, prospective students may find its location and student life less appealing, receiving the lowest scores in these areas. Accommodation and facilities are rated moderately, offering a decent experience. The university presents a mixed picture, with academic strengths overshadowed by shortcomings in campus experience and accessibility.

This institution is highly regarded across several key areas, excelling particularly in Student Life (4.45) and Value (4.42). Internationality also received a strong score (4.32). The university demonstrates good performance in Facilities (4.26) and Professors (4.26), with Accomodation also scoring well (4.1). Location, while still positive, is the weakest rated aspect among the surveyed categories (3.84).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with its strongest area being **Value**, earning a 4.38. **Professors** also received high marks. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest rating at 3.89, suggesting this is the area for potential improvement, though other aspects like Facilities and Student Life remain solid.

This institution excels significantly in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are notable weaknesses, each rated at the lowest possible score. Student life is moderately rated, while the overall value proposition receives a below-average score.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are mixed, with a ~33% rating of 1-2 stars and a ~33% rating of 4-5 stars. Positive feedback highlights strong finance/accounting faculty and social opportunities. Negative comments focus on understaffing and poor communication, particularly for international students.

With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise strong professor and peer connections, a friendly community, and the Aggie Network. Some mention needing to actively search for assistance. No 1-2 star reviews were present.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent facilities, wonderful teachers, and the convenience of distance learning, fostering a supportive community and preparing them for the future. No negative reviews were recorded.

With a single review and an average rating of 5/5, this university garners ~100% positive feedback. The student highlighted engaging professors and a fascinating, practical pharmacy curriculum.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
48%
0%
0%
54%
100%
0%
4★
0%
38%
0%
0%
31%
0%
0%
3★
33%
14%
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
truth about the university

I was registered at the beykent university and I am an international student . The university is understaffed and they do not have good communication or do not have the capability to respond to emails . they do not care about educational sevices . The university focuses on payments and unlike others they asked payments for the whole year . they do not evaluate the certificates for international admissions and accept them easily after receiving money . so the international students go to the university and had to leave after not receiving equivalency certificates . they do not refund and that’s the gambling business the university is carrying out . 0 stars

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Related articles

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close