Data Science Dojo vs University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST vs Sudan University for Science and Technology vs Politeknik APP Jakarta vs University of Khartoum - UofK

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Data Science Dojo: wins 0/5 categories
University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST: wins 1/5 categories
Sudan University for Science and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 3/5 categories
University of Khartoum - UofK: wins 1/5 categories
Aconcagua University - UdA: wins 0/5 categories
The National Ribat University - NRU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Redmond, Washington, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Architecture
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Best programme: Pharmacy
Mendoza, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.43
2.00
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.29
Win
2.67
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
3.43
2.67
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.43
2.67
4.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.14
3.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.57
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.17
2.00
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs with practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and community
  • +High adaptability and modern facilities
  • +Engaging lectures and active student community
  • +Extensive social events and party scene
  • +Accessible educational support
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
  • +Academic and social growth opportunities
  • +Comprehensive and relevant course content
  • +Diverse and engaging community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create a difficult student experience.
  • -The course content and assessments lack depth and thoroughness.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive instructors are prevalent complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location**, which received a high rating. In contrast, **Student Life** stands out as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Internationality are rated similarly, while Accomodation and Value fall in the mid-range.

This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. It excels significantly in Student Life, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, Location and Internationality are identified as its weakest aspects, both receiving low marks. Other categories like Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, while Professors and Value are strong points.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting academic strength, practical learning, and a good community. A few negative reviews cite administrative issues and unfocused courses. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives largely positive feedback. Students highlight academic growth, diverse course offerings, and a rich social experience within a diverse community. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
29%
33%
100%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close