L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs Marbella Design Academy vs University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST vs Sudan University for Science and Technology vs University of Khartoum - UofK

Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST (4.10)
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 3/5 categories
Marbella Design Academy: wins 0/5 categories
University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST: wins 1/5 categories
Sudan University for Science and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
University of Khartoum - UofK: wins 1/5 categories
Iqbal Memorial Govt. College: wins 0/5 categories
The National Ribat University - NRU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Art and Design
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.78
2.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
3.00
Not rated
4.44
Win
2.67
2.00
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
3.78
2.67
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.78
2.67
2.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.00
Not rated
3.56
3.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.00
Not rated
3.89
3.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.63
2.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality education and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
  • +Strong faculty and well-structured academic programs
  • +Engaging lectures and active student community
  • +Extensive social events and party scene
  • +Accessible educational support
  • +Academic and social growth opportunities
  • +Comprehensive and relevant course content
  • +Diverse and engaging community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues make the university experience difficult and unresponsive to student needs.
  • -The course content and assessments lack depth and thoroughness, leaving students feeling unprepared.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive instructors are prevalent complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates strong performance in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, scoring lowest among the evaluated aspects. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally well-rounded experience with a standout location. Accommodations also scored reasonably well.

This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. It excels significantly in Student Life, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, Location and Internationality are identified as its weakest aspects, both receiving low marks. Other categories like Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, while Professors and Value are strong points.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

Nothing to show

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, practical learning, and a supportive environment. ~22% of feedback mentions issues with unfocused courses and administrative challenges.

With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives largely positive feedback. Students highlight academic growth, diverse course offerings, and a rich social experience within a diverse community. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
56%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
22%
33%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close