Royal Tropical Institute (KIT) vs Lincoln International Business School vs Ebonyi State University - EBSU vs Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL vs David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences - DUFUH

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Royal Tropical Institute (KIT): wins 2/3 categories
Lincoln International Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Ebonyi State University - EBSU: wins 0/3 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 1/3 categories
David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences - DUFUH: wins 0/3 categories
Evangel University Akaeze - EUA: wins 0/3 categories
Pundra University of Science and Technology: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Public Health
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Biology
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.50
3.06
5.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.00
4.19
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
3.50
3.83
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
5.00
3.44
3.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
4.00
3.44
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Value
5.00
4.50
3.78
5.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
4.00
2.94
5.00
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Top-notch faculty and industry-leading expertise
  • +Focus on internationally accepted best practices
  • +Supportive and friendly staff and environment
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Effective teaching and immediate issue resolution
  • +Quality teaching and dedicated, approachable lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and hands-on experience
  • +Positive campus life and diverse student community
  • +Updated and relevant program content
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Well-resourced library and effective virtual learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable lecturers.
  • +Positive impact on emotional, spiritual, and academic growth.
  • +Serene environment and modern facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administration.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of clear communication from instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a concern.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and learning experiences is disappointing.
  • -Outdated and overcrowded facilities, with a lack of on-campus accommodation.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a constant problem.
  • -There are frequent complaints about poor communication and lack of support.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines with outstanding scores in facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect marks. Conversely, the location of the university is a notable weakness, indicated by a score of zero. The overall evaluation suggests a highly regarded academic environment with excellent support services, though geographical placement is a significant drawback.

This institution scores remarkably well, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect 5. Facilities and Value also stand out at 4.5. Location, Student Life, and Accommodations are solid at 4. The weakest area, however, is **Professors**, receiving a rating of 3.5, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect of the university experience.

This university demonstrates a particularly strong showing in **Location**, receiving a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Professors and Value also received positive marks. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately, while Facilities fall slightly below the average.

This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, location, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality. Student life and professors are also highly rated. The weakest aspect appears to be internationality, with a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and accessibility, with excellent perceived value.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Value for money stands out with a top rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving high marks. Areas performing less strongly include Accomodation, which received a lower score compared to the others. Location also registered as a solid, though not outstanding, aspect of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The sole review is highly positive (100%), rating the university 5/5. Key strengths include top-tier faculty and internationally accepted best practices in public health, especially recommended for scholars from LMICs. There is no negative feedback.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent facilities and supportive staff. They praise the variety of resources, comfortable environments, and friendly people.

With a 3.83 average rating from 18 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting quality teaching and professors. A single negative review (~5.6%) mentioned infrastructure challenges and overcrowded lecture halls.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the updated program content focusing on new technologies and media. They praise excellent professor support and quick assignment feedback, alongside an extensive library.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average. Students praise the high learning standards, qualified lecturers, and modern facilities. One review also notes a serene environment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
33%
50%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
50%
22%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Review for KIT Royal Tropical Institute

The faculty members for international public health/masters of public are top notch in the industry. They teach internationally accepted best practices in the public health space. I highly recommend them for any serious minded scholar, especially from LMICs

Nothing to show

Life of a medical student in EBSU

Being a medical student in my university is very intense. This can be both a good thing and a bad thing. With an intensive curriculum that will keep you very engaged academically there's really not much going on socially apart from the annual student health week program organized by the student body. I like that my school has started building a system that would make it possible for medical students to finish their studies and graduate in record time instead of the usual situation where they end up staying like 2-3 years extra. I don't like the daily schedule of lectures though. Lectures start by 7am and ends by 5pm mostly everyday. This makes it very hard for students especially those in clinical medicine to have a school - life balance. There's literally no time for extra curricular activities which makes it hard for students to explore other options without it affecting their academics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close