Dalarna University vs Sacred Heart University vs University of Tlemcen vs University Centre of Maghnia vs Catholic University of Pernambuco - UNICAP

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Dalarna University: wins 0/6 categories
Sacred Heart University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Tlemcen: wins 0/6 categories
University Centre of Maghnia: wins 0/6 categories
Catholic University of Pernambuco - UNICAP: wins 0/6 categories
Dawat University - D.U: wins 0/6 categories
Polytechnique Montréal: wins 6/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Data Science
Fairfield, Connecticut, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Kabul, Afghanistan
3.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
2.50
4.50
4.50
1.00
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Win
Location
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
3.50
5.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Internationality
2.50
4.00
4.50
1.00
Not rated
1.00
5.00
Win
Student life
3.00
4.50
4.00
2.00
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Win
Value
3.50
4.50
4.50
3.00
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
4.50
4.00
1.00
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +University's quality and campus facilities.
  • +Strong global communications and international affairs programs
  • +Supportive and flexible online social work program
  • +Island location and proximity to Old San Juan
  • +Strong academic foundation and preparation for the workforce
  • +Opportunities for supplementary learning through seminars and webinars
  • +Faculty expertise and development of practical skills

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expert and dedicated professors
  • +Vibrant student life
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of effective communication and unclear expectations are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinders learning.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as not relevant or current.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of effective communication leads to unmet student expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a mixed rating profile. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both receiving a solid 3.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, scoring a low 2. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately at 2.5, while location and student life achieve a respectable 3.

Overall, this university receives excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Professors (5)**, **Facilities (4.5)**, **Student Life (4.5)**, and **Accomodation (4.5)**. These areas suggest a supportive and well-resourced environment. The university also scores well in **Internationality (4)** and **Value (4.5)**. The weakest area is **Location**, receiving a 3.5 rating, indicating this may be a point of consideration.

This university garners excellent marks in several key areas. Its strongest aspects include its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.5, alongside strong **Value** at the same rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** also receive solid scores of 4. The **Location** is the weakest area, rated at 3.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value were all rated a maximum of 5 out of 5. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in every area evaluated, with no particular category standing out as weaker than others given the uniformly high marks.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating, most feedback is positive (~100%). One student found the Borlänge campus building great but struggled with obtaining student information through confused online platforms.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, reviews highlight exceptional Global Communications and International Affairs programs. Students also praise strong support systems for online Master's programs.

Both reviews are highly positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students praise academic successes, knowledgeable faculty, and a curriculum that prepares them for the work field, including useful lab work and skill development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise competent professors and a vibrant student life. No negative reviews were submitted.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close