Universidad Politécnica de Tulancingo - UPT vs Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia - UPCH vs Brooklyn College - BC vs Upper School of Arts and Design - ESAD.CR vs East Los Angeles College - ELAC
Side-by-side comparison from 290 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and apt teachers
- +Good facilities and opportunities for foreigners
- +Positive career prospects and track record
- +Quality education & skill development
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Dedicated and skilled professors
- +Knowledgeable, accessible, and supportive professors
- +Strong sense of community and diverse friendships
- +Value for money and flexible programs
Nothing to show
- +Supportive professors & accessible academic help
- +Affordable, quality education & career-focused programs
- +Abundant resources & motivational learning environment
- +Supportive staff & faculty investment
- +Engaging teaching & effective career support
- +Good campus life & modern facilities
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and poor communication cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course relevance is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are a major concern.
Nothing to show
Assessment of the institution reveals a consistent performance across all measured aspects. With identical zero ratings for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight. The university presents a uniform and undifferentiated profile in this evaluation.
This institution shines particularly bright in **Internationality** and **Value**, earning impressive scores of 4.8 and 4.9 respectively. Conversely, its **Location** and **Student Life** present areas for development, with ratings of 2.9 and 2.8. The university also received solid, albeit less outstanding, marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors** (3.6), and **Accomodation** (2.8).
Student life and professors are the standout strengths, both receiving high marks. The university also performs well in internationality, accommodation, and value. Location and facilities are rated competently, though they represent the lower end of the spectrum compared to other evaluated aspects.
Nothing to show
Across key areas, this institution garners outstanding feedback. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received perfect scores, reflecting exceptional strengths. Accommodations and value for money were also highly rated, though slightly below the top tier with 4.5 stars. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently strong and positive performance across its offerings.
This institution garners positive feedback across most areas, with its **strongest performances in Internationality and Value**, both scoring 3.625. Professors also receive a commendable rating of 3.8125. Conversely, **Facilities represent the weakest area**, averaging a score of 2.647. Student life, accommodation, and location fall within a moderate range, indicating generally satisfactory but not exceptional experiences in these aspects.
Nothing to show
This university has a strong reputation, particularly for its engineering and bachelor's programs. Positive feedback highlights apt teachers and good facilities, making it a valuable opportunity for international students. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights prestigious education, skill development, and supportive professors. No negative feedback was reported.
With ~99% positive feedback, students highlight accessible, knowledgeable professors, flexible programs, and a strong sense of community. The campus is praised for its beauty and modern facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight superb professors providing thorough lesson plans and readily available support. They also praise the quality education, good price, abundant resources, and campus motivation for career dreams.
A high percentage of positive feedback (around 69%) highlights supportive staff, engaging teaching, and good campus life. Some note theoretical focus and stress as areas for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH) is a very prestigious university in Peru, since it provides a quality education for all, provides opportunities for all to develop their skills and abilities for their professional life, It provides a pleasant environment to study and dialogue with our colleagues and above all they have professors with vocation. Personally, I am very grateful for the quality teaching that they offer me, since I have been able to develop my potential, abilities, skills and discover hidden talents, which I am very grateful. I recommend everyone to study at this university, as they will obtain a quality education that will be meaningful learning for their professional lives.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show