Cebu Technological University - CTU vs University of San Carlos - USC vs Cebu Normal University - CNU vs Gullas College of Medicine - GCM vs Cebu Institute of Technology - University
Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and teaching quality
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including libraries and gym
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +high-quality, advanced education and knowledgeable professors
- +strong academic programs and reputation, especially for law
- +commitment to academic excellence and community service
- +Quality education and well-equipped graduates
- +Motivating academic standards
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Demanding and effective academic programs
- +Valuable practical and clinical experiences
- +Confidence building and positive environment
- +Inclusive and accepting atmosphere
- +High-quality educators and supportive administration
- +Relevant, real-world courses and strong academic programs
- +Excellent facilities and study spaces
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear communication and disorganization, are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant and sometimes unsafe learning environment.
- -A lack of course relevance and outdated curriculum leaves students feeling unprepared for their future careers.
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient support for student well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as lacking.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & resources
- -Lack of student support & engagement
- -Ineffective communication and disorganized administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of resources
This institution receives strong marks across most surveyed areas. Professors and value are standout categories, both scoring above 4.5. Student life, accommodation, and internationality also exhibit impressive ratings around 4.3-4.5. The weakest area identified is facilities, with a rating of 3.87. Overall, the university presents a positive picture with specific strengths in academic quality and overall value.
This institution demonstrates a strong appeal in several key areas. Student Life and Value stand out as the highest-rated aspects, suggesting a positive and worthwhile experience. Location and Internationality also score very well. Conversely, Facilities represent the weakest area, with a noticeably lower rating compared to other categories. Accommodations and Professors also received solid, but not exceptional, scores.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **location** and **value**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores, respectively. **Professors** also garnered a high rating. Conversely, the university's **facilities** and **student life** are areas where ratings are lower, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. **Accommodations** and **internationality** fall somewhere in the middle of the spectrum.
Nothing to show
Remarkably strong across most aspects, this institution excels in Internationality and Value, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life also garnered outstanding marks of 4.75. The only area scoring lower, though still very good, is Accomodation at 4.25, representing its relative weakest point among the evaluated criteria.
Across a comprehensive review, the institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. The sole area not receiving a top score is Facilities, which is rated a strong 4 out of 5. This indicates a generally outstanding university experience with only minor room for enhancement in its physical infrastructure.
This university's facilities stand out as a significant strength, receiving a high rating. Areas demonstrating solid performance include professors and accommodation, both scoring a 4. Location and student life, however, present the weakest aspects, with lower ratings in comparison to other categories. Internationality and value also received moderate scores.
With a 4.65/5 average from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise newly built and well-equipped facilities, including libraries and gyms, along with excellent and friendly professors. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise academic quality, curriculum, and professors. Some highlight practical learning and a clean environment.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are predominantly positive (~67%). Students praise the quality of education, highlighting its effectiveness in producing well-equipped individuals. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.5/5. Recurring themes highlight professional and supportive professors, strong academic programs, and valuable clinical experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
This university has a perfect rating of 5/5, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students appreciate how the school brings out their best, boosts confidence, and promotes gender equality.
With 3 positive reviews and no negative feedback, students largely highlight excellent educators and admin. Facilities are also frequently praised. The average rating is 3.8/5.
The University is a state university and cant accommodate everyone, it means the students have to gain the slot. Students are selected by their grades from Senior High School and their scores from the entrance exam. It didn't end there, once they admit the students, they are required to retain a specific grade, failure to do so, is subjected to look for a private University. I highly recommend this University.
I consider myself fortunate to have had the opportunity to attend the University of San Carlos during its prime. The education I received there was of high quality, although there were a few professors who were average in their teaching approaches. One aspect that truly stands out is the strong sense of community among the Carolinians, which creates a supportive and enriching environment. However, it's worth noting that the school does face some shortcomings when it comes to its facilities. Many of them are outdated, which is understandable considering the school's long history. Given the tuition fees, one would naturally expect better and more modern facilities. This is an area where the university could make improvements to enhance the overall learning experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show