Beijing Film Academy - BFA vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs Synergy University vs ESEUNE Business School vs University of International Business and Economics - UIBE

Side-by-side comparison from 4 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: TIAS School for Business and Society (5.00)
Beijing Film Academy - BFA: wins 0/4 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 3/4 categories
Synergy University: wins 0/4 categories
ESEUNE Business School: wins 0/4 categories
University of International Business and Economics - UIBE: wins 0/4 categories
Capital Normal University - CNU: wins 0/4 categories
Beijing Union University: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Beijing, China
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade and Finance
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Value
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Positive environment and abundant resources
  • +Access to department-specific equipment
  • +Effective learning through homework completion
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student body and English-taught programs
  • +Strong business and international trade focus
  • +Generous and welcoming community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, application-oriented education
  • +Approachable and invested professors
  • +Friendly campus and industry connections
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are major concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Performance across key university metrics is remarkably consistent, with no standout strengths or weaknesses identified. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received identical ratings, suggesting a uniform perception in these areas. This lack of differentiation indicates a neutral standing across all evaluated aspects, with no specific category exceeding or falling below expectations compared to others.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution scores exceptionally well in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are its weakest areas, each rated a moderate 3. **Professors** are a stronger suit, with a rating of 4.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all received excellent ratings of 4. Areas requiring more attention include facilities and accommodation, both scoring a moderate 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the positive environment and provided resources, with some noting challenges with teaching methods and foreigner integration.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The sole review highlights the university's diversity and English-taught programs, particularly for business and international trade majors. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4/5.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting practical, application-oriented education, approachable professors, and a supportive campus environment.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close