Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - UASB vs Misr University for Science & Technology - MUST vs National University of Water and Environmental Engineering - NUWEE vs Suleyman Demirel University vs National University of Lesotho - NUL

Side-by-side comparison from 113 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - UASB (5.00)
Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar - UASB: wins 7/7 categories
Misr University for Science & Technology - MUST: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Water and Environmental Engineering - NUWEE: wins 0/7 categories
Suleyman Demirel University: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Lesotho - NUL: wins 0/7 categories
RMIT Vietnam: wins 0/7 categories
Lerotholi Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Construction Engineering Technician
Best programme: Applied Foreign Languages
Best programme: Foreign Languages
Best programme: Development Studies
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
4.60
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Business
Maseru, Lesotho
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.60
Not rated
4.08
4.29
4.61
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
4.75
Not rated
4.20
4.20
4.80
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.20
Not rated
4.28
4.71
4.67
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.40
Not rated
2.97
4.14
4.56
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
4.40
Not rated
3.94
4.33
4.74
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.60
Not rated
3.97
4.14
4.69
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.60
Not rated
3.23
4.43
4.58
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive colleagues and good teachers
  • +Relevant and practical career curriculum
  • +Positive overall experience and good location
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Well-structured, advanced academic programs
  • +Good facilities and a comfortable, beautiful campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent campus facilities and modern learning environments
  • +Supportive and dedicated staff/faculty with engaging teaching
  • +Strong career support and employment opportunities
  • +Rigorous and relevant curriculum
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Authentic university experience and community
  • +International learning environment and multiculturalism
  • +Practical, interactive learning and career-oriented education
  • +Strong industry connections and internship opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources were disappointing.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality did not meet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff are problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hindered learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Excessive administrative and bureaucratic processes.
  • -Poor quality instruction and lack of engaging teaching methods.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves a perfect score across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as outstanding. Given the uniform excellence, there are no distinct weakest or strongest areas; the university demonstrates consistently exceptional performance in every evaluated aspect.

This institution excels in several key areas, with **location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.75. Facilities, accommodation, and value also receive excellent scores of 4.6. Student life and internationality are well-regarded at 4.4. The **professors** represent the lowest-rated category, though still a strong 4.2, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university receives solid ratings across most aspects, with professors and location being standout strengths. Student life and value for money also perform well. However, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest scores in the survey. Facilities are rated moderately.

Overall, this university garners favorable ratings across various aspects. The strongest area appears to be **Professors**, with an impressive score. Other well-regarded categories include Accomodation and Student Life. The lowest-scoring areas, though still decent, are Internationality and Value, both receiving identical ratings.

Across various aspects of student experience, this university demonstrates notable strengths. It achieved particularly high marks in Value (4.69) and Professors (4.67), indicating strong academic and financial offerings. Internationality also scored well at 4.56. The weakest area identified is Facilities, with a rating of 3.97, though other categories like Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a similar range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights good teachers, location, and curriculum, with supportive colleagues noted.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, all five reviews are positive. Students highlight the well-structured academic programs, supportive professors, and good facilities. Many appreciate the beautiful campus and opportunities for growth.

Nothing to show

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 64 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent campus facilities and supportive staff. There are no negative reviews.

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students praise academic excellence, dedicated faculty, and a strong sense of community. Some mention outdated course content and concerns about lecturer harassment.

All 36 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.61/5. Students highlight interactive learning, international environments, practical skills development, and strong industry connections. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
40%
0%
9%
43%
61%
0%
4★
0%
60%
0%
72%
57%
39%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Why MUST ?

MUST is a private university located in 6th of October City, Egypt, and it was founded in 1996. The university offers undergraduate and graduate programs in a variety of fields, including engineering, business, pharmacy, and mass communication, in additionto languages

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

About NUL

I have graduated from the National University of Lesotho. Is the oldest and biggest nation's University and one of the best. Though there are still a lot of issues in the functioning of the University, I would still consider it as one of the best in Lesotho. Definitely! I would recommend any one to study at NUL and I wish to do my Master Degree at NUL.

Big big big

If you read this, this is a signal for you to go to RMIT Mel. The school is so big lol. It will take 2 semesters to explore everything. Internet cafes, labs, exhibition areas, displays, virtual reality... Everything is there so go quickly. * food behind school is cheaper than outside. Near school there is fortune alleys which is also quite delicious

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close