University of Kiel vs Brooklyn College - BC vs UniDomBosco vs Carousel Training Centre vs Université GSI Madagascar

Side-by-side comparison from 271 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Carousel Training Centre (5.00)
University of Kiel: wins 0/7 categories
Brooklyn College - BC: wins 0/7 categories
UniDomBosco: wins 0/7 categories
Carousel Training Centre: wins 7/7 categories
Université GSI Madagascar: wins 0/7 categories
About Madagascar National Tele-Education Center - CNTEMAD: wins 0/7 categories
University of Antananarivo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biochemistry
New York City, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
268 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Fortaleza, Brazil
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Children
Antananarivo, Madagascar
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Antananarivo, Madagascar
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.76
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
2.50
3.82
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
2.50
4.28
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
2.50
4.31
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.13
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
4.02
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Rigorous chemistry foundation prepares for advanced studies.
  • +Knowledgeable, accessible, and supportive professors
  • +Strong sense of community and diverse friendships
  • +Value for money and flexible programs

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and kind staff/lecturers
  • +Accessible and helpful academic support
  • +Pleasant and easy to travel to environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of support for international students and a significant language barrier.
  • -Social science programs are underdeveloped.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
  • -Inadequate resources and support services for students.
  • -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a respectable 3.5 out of 5. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include accommodation, rated at a low 2, and professors, location, and student life, all scoring 2.5. While internationality is rated moderately at 3, the university's value for money stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving a high 4.

Student life and professors are the standout strengths, both receiving high marks. The university also performs well in internationality, accommodation, and value. Location and facilities are rated competently, though they represent the lower end of the spectrum compared to other evaluated aspects.

Nothing to show

Across the board, this institution achieves perfect scores, indicating an excellent experience in every assessed area. Its strengths lie in exceptionally high ratings for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified given the uniform top marks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 2.5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is split evenly. One reviewer highlights challenging but rewarding chemistry studies, while the other notes shortcomings in social sciences and minimal support for international students.

With ~99% positive feedback, students highlight accessible, knowledgeable professors, flexible programs, and a strong sense of community. The campus is praised for its beauty and modern facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The reviewer praised the relaxed environment, supportive staff, helpful assessors, and accessible coursework support.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
10%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
89%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close