Canterbury Christ Church University - CCCU vs University of Embu - UOEM vs Universitas Diponegoro vs Universitas Dian Nuswantoro - UDINUS vs Sultan Agung Islamic University

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Diponegoro (4.90)
Canterbury Christ Church University - CCCU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Embu - UOEM: wins 1/7 categories
Universitas Diponegoro: wins 6/7 categories
Universitas Dian Nuswantoro - UDINUS: wins 0/7 categories
Sultan Agung Islamic University: wins 0/7 categories
Satya Wacana Christian University: wins 0/7 categories
Semarang State University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Canterbury, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Media
Best programme: Education
Semarang, Indonesia
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: English Literature
Best programme: English Language and Literature
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Semarang, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.50
4.55
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.23
4.57
Win
4.55
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.64
4.82
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.86
4.21
4.27
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.38
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.86
4.64
4.73
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.14
4.36
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming campus environment and good facilities
  • +Helpful staff and diverse academic programs
  • +Strong student welfare and inclusive community
  • +Responsive administration and continuous improvement of facilities and digital learning tools
  • +Open, understanding, and committed faculty with a focus on discussion-based learning
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional growth with enriched curriculum and extracurriculars
  • +Strong academic reputation and competent lecturers.
  • +Practical learning opportunities and career preparation.
  • +Affordable tuition and high educational quality.
  • +Strong computer science program
  • +Convenient central location
  • +Supportive personal development environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant disruption.
  • -Disorganized administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as uninspiring and lacking relevance.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of relevant curriculum frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant obstacles.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of practical application and industry relevance in coursework is a concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are also rated positively. Areas that received less enthusiastic feedback include **Internationality** and **Value**. **Location** falls somewhere in the middle, reflecting a solid but not exceptional standing.

This university receives strong ratings across multiple areas, with professors and value achieving the highest scores. Facilities and location also demonstrate excellent performance. Student life, while still positive, is the weakest rated category, alongside accommodation and internationality, though these remain above average.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Professors also received outstanding marks. Areas like Accomodation and Internationality, while still strong, show slightly lower scores compared to the overall high performance. Facilities and Location are rated very positively, as is the Value proposition.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strength across most surveyed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received a solid four out of five stars. However, the accommodation rating stands out as a significant weakness, scoring a zero, indicating a critical area for improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.21 average rating, ~93% of reviews are positive, praising campus, facilities, and inclusivity. A small percentage (~7%) noted minor issues with event attendance and parking.

With a 4.64 average rating from 14 reviews, ~93% are highly positive. Students praise responsive administration, good facilities, and supportive professors. Minor concerns include missing marks and internet accessibility.

With an average rating of 4.91/5, reviews highlight Diponegoro University's strong academic reputation and quality education. Students praised competent lecturers, diverse programs, and practical learning opportunities, with no negative feedback reported.

The university is highly rated (4/5 stars), with ~100% of feedback being positive. Students appreciate the opportunities for personal and academic development, particularly in Computer Science, and its central location. Limited parking is a minor concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
71%
91%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
21%
9%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Faculty Experience and Classes.

The Professors are very open and understanding, their offices are always open for discussions on the Unit's subject matter. They are also very open to discussions about their methods of teaching and how they can be improved. The classes are focused on discussion considering it is a Law class. Open discussions on the reasoning behind certain principals or the controversy/morality dilemmas are open. Working together as groups to create presentations that will be shared with the class is also a core tenet.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close