University Goce Delcev vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs HZ University of Applied Sciences - HZ vs School of Health Sciences of Alcoitão - ESSA vs Barisal Institute of Information Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: HZ University of Applied Sciences - HZ (5.00)
University Goce Delcev: wins 0/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/7 categories
HZ University of Applied Sciences - HZ: wins 6/7 categories
School of Health Sciences of Alcoitão - ESSA: wins 0/7 categories
Barisal Institute of Information Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Talisay City College - TCC: wins 0/7 categories
Global University Bangladesh: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: General Medicine
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Middelburg, The Netherlands
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Best programme: Occupational Therapy
Cebu City, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
barisal, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.25
4.67
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
2.67
4.75
Win
4.67
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.67
3.25
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.67
3.50
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
2.67
3.75
4.67
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.33
2.75
4.67
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
2.00
4.33
Win
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and dedicated professors
  • +Relevant and modern academic programs
  • +Friendly and international community
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Practical, real-world focus
  • +International and diverse community
  • +Supportive, close-knit environment
  • +Early and direct professional experience opportunities
  • +Strong foundation in physiotherapy and related fields
  • +Supportive learning environment and resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent and poor quality instruction diminishes academic value.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder progress.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university presents a mixed review, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring a solid 3.67. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** received moderate ratings of 3. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** are identified as the weakest points, each averaging 2.67. The **Value** proposition sits in the middle at 3.33.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution receives outstanding marks across most aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value are all rated at a near-perfect 4.67. Internationality stands out as a perfect 5. Accommodations, while still strong, are the lowest rated category at 4.33, representing the sole area for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates a solid academic offering with professors receiving a strong rating of 4. Its location is also well-regarded at 4. Areas for improvement are evident in student life and internationality, both scoring 3. Facilities, accommodation, and value for money are rated a respectable 3.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, the university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from students. Recurring themes highlight supportive and informative professors, a positive learning environment, and valuable international experiences.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight practical, real-world project experience and an international environment. The program is seen as future-focused and impactful.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the university's pioneering role and early professional exposure, while one notes professors are "old schools."

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
50%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
25%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The university is just fine. Always puts my interests first.

The university is just fine. Always puts my interests first. The professors are also very nice and informative. The Erasmus + program works very well, a lot of students have already went on the Erasmus + exchange program.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close