Universidad El Bosque vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad El Bosque: wins 2/7 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina - Areandina: wins 4/7 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/7 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 1/7 categories
Fundación Universidad de América: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.82
Win
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
4.20
1.00
Not rated
Location
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
3.80
1.00
Not rated
Professors
4.57
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.17
1.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.47
Not rated
3.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Student life
4.29
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.20
1.00
Not rated
Value
4.10
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
1.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.60
Not rated
3.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
1.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong medical and nursing programs with practical experience opportunities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment with friendly teachers and peers
  • +Excellent personal and professional development opportunities, including exchanges

Nothing to show

  • +Quality programs and affordable tuition
  • +Practical experience and real-world application
  • +Career advancement opportunities and international agreements
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Supportive and high-quality teaching
  • +Ample green campus spaces

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are recurring complaints.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
  • -Poor administrative and management practices.
  • -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates significant strengths. It excels particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving an outstanding rating. **Professors** and **Location** also scored highly. However, areas requiring improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.

Nothing to show

The university receives exceptionally strong feedback in several key areas, with facilities, professors, location, and student life all earning near-perfect scores. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as comparatively weaker aspects, scoring notably lower. The value for money is also rated favorably, though not as highly as the top-tier categories.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting strong medical programs, excellent personal/professional development opportunities, and positive learning environments with good facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive (100%), highlighting quality study programs, affordability, and enriching experiences. Students appreciate transformative programs, skilled teachers, and practical application opportunities. The university also fosters business sector support and international specialization agreements.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
100%
100%
43%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
29%
50%
0%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The worst experience

Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close