Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP vs Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI vs Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC vs Universidad de San Martín de Porres - USMP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Tecnológica del Perú - UTP: wins 6/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de San Martín de Porres - USMP: wins 0/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal - UNFV: wins 0/6 categories
Escuela Nacional Superior de Arte Dramatico: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.00
3.67
3.00
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
4.43
3.00
4.78
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.50
4.38
4.00
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.50
4.00
3.50
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
Win
4.50
4.00
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.00
3.50
3.00
3.22
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent technology and didactic teaching
  • +Strong focus on professional and personal development
  • +Positive peer relationships
  • +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
  • +Supportive community and positive campus environment
  • +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty
  • +Career-focused curriculum and expert instructors
  • +Professional and personal growth opportunities
  • +Diverse programs and cultural immersion
  • +Practical learning experiences and quality study programs
  • +Supportive and innovative teaching methods
  • +Good infrastructure and administrative support
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
  • -Financial burden of tuition fees.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication regarding policies, procedures, and academic advising.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities, including insufficient study spaces and technology.
  • -Bureaucratic administrative processes and unresponsive staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners top marks across all evaluated aspects, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated exceptionally high. There are no apparent weaknesses, with the university demonstrating outstanding performance uniformly.

This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, both receiving high scores. Internationality and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and facilities present areas for improvement, indicating these aspects are less favorably perceived by students. Overall, the institution appears to offer a positive experience, with specific categories requiring more attention.

Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most aspects. Its strongest areas are the quality of its professors and a vibrant student life and international community, both receiving solid 4 and 3.5 ratings respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are identified as areas for improvement, each scoring a 3. The university offers a fair value proposition, also rated at 3.5.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight professional development and excellent laboratory technology. Clear and didactic teaching from professors is also a recurring theme.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.

With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of students praise diverse courses, excellent teachers, and strong career preparation. One review (~11%) mentions high tuition costs.

With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong communications programs, good study plans, and effective teaching. Areas for improvement include curriculum updates and expanded internship/job placement agreements.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
100%
56%
0%
67%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
22%
100%
33%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close