United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK vs Maasai Mara University

Side-by-side comparison from 101 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 1/5 categories
Maseno University: wins 2/5 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 0/5 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/5 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/5 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/5 categories
Kumamoto University: wins 2/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering and Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.14
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.75
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.75
4.49
4.00
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.50
3.97
4.50
Not rated
3.63
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.25
Win
4.21
4.00
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.50
4.53
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical skills & relevant coursework
  • +Diverse and expert faculty
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

Nothing to show

Performance across surveyed categories reveals a mixed yet generally positive university profile. The institution excels significantly in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are identified as the weakest areas, each scoring a moderate 3 out of 5. Student life and internationality both garnered solid ratings, suggesting good engagement and a diverse campus environment, with value also being well-received.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating 4 out of 5 stars. It highlights learning practical skills in electrical circuits and information systems, aiding job prospects. Professors' diverse expertise was also praised.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
60%
50%
0%
63%
0%
0%
4★
0%
31%
50%
0%
25%
0%
100%
3★
25%
8%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close