ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs Maseno University vs The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP vs Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK vs Maasai Mara University

Side-by-side comparison from 104 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Cebu Maritime Education and Training Center - UC-METC (4.80)
ESG Ecoles de Commerce: wins 0/6 categories
Maseno University: wins 0/6 categories
The Kisumu National Polytechnic - TKNP: wins 0/6 categories
Great Lakes University of Kisumu - GLUK: wins 0/6 categories
Maasai Mara University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Cebu Maritime Education and Training Center - UC-METC: wins 6/6 categories
Tom Mboya University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Aix en Provence, France
4.00
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
kisumu, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: Accounting
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.75
4.14
4.00
Not rated
3.88
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.25
4.31
4.50
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.49
4.00
Not rated
4.25
4.75
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.75
3.97
4.50
Not rated
3.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.25
4.21
4.00
Not rated
3.75
4.75
Win
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.53
4.50
Not rated
4.38
4.75
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
3.98
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, career-oriented education with real-life projects
  • +Attentive and available staff and faculty
  • +Diverse program options for professional development
  • +Strong academic environment and practical learning focus
  • +Supportive atmosphere with approachable, passionate instructors
  • +Well-structured programmes with engaging teaching methods
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and career-oriented education
  • +Dedicated lecturers and supportive learning environment
  • +Development of essential soft skills and overall personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Holistic learning and diverse activities
  • +Quality education and modern facilities
  • +High quality and practical education
  • +Friendly and approachable instructors and staff
  • +Engaging learning environment and activities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources were frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality did not meet expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Limited communication and transparency from the institution.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading policies.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and clear communication is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Professors and location stand out as exceptional strengths, receiving high marks. Student life, however, emerges as the weakest area with a noticeably lower rating. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are rated solidly in the mid-range, contributing to an overall balanced profile with a strong emphasis on academic quality. The university also scores well for its value.

Overall, this university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in the value of education, with a rating of 4.53. Professors also receive high marks at 4.49, alongside a positive student life experience at 4.21. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation and internationality, both scoring just under 4.0. Facilities and location also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

This institution garners consistently high marks, with its **location** and **internationality** standing out as its strongest attributes at 4.5. Its **value for money** also received a top score of 4.5. Other aspects, including **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, are all rated a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience across the board.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location** (4.5) and **Value** (4.375), alongside an impressive score for **Professors** (4.25). **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also received favorable marks. The **Internationality** aspect, however, registers as the lowest rated area at 3.625, with **Facilities** also performing slightly below average at 3.875.

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance in **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Student Life, Accomodation, and Value also show considerable strengths with high ratings. The weakest area, while still strong, is **Professors** at 4.75, with Location also slightly lower at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, most reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented education and a modern campus with diverse activities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With ~93% of 86 reviews being positive, students praise the university's supportive atmosphere, practical learning, and well-structured programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, these 2 reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight excellent communication, teamwork, dedication, love for education, and the quality of courses and lecturers. Practical learning and supportive lecturers preparing students for real-world situations are also praised.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviewers are positive. Students commend dedicated lecturers, quality education, and a holistic learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise the quality of education, engaging learning methods, ample activities, and friendly, accommodating instructors and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
60%
50%
0%
63%
75%
0%
4★
50%
31%
50%
0%
25%
25%
0%
3★
25%
8%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nice place to be

I enjoyed learning at the university. The lectures were nice and students were nice to everyone, I found it easier to interact with everyone at school. However, life was tough in general due to lack of enough funds to support my student upkeep. But I recommend the school to anyone

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close