Loyola College vs University of Madras vs Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology vs Indian maritime University vs Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Indian maritime University (5.00)
Loyola College: wins 0/2 categories
University of Madras: wins 0/2 categories
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology: wins 0/2 categories
Indian maritime University: wins 2/2 categories
Patrician College of Arts and Science - PCAS: wins 0/2 categories
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University: wins 0/2 categories
St.Peter's College of Engineering and Technology - SPCET: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Chennai, India
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Physics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
2.00
Location
4.57
4.71
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.60
4.10
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.13
3.80
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Student life
4.33
4.14
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Value
4.13
3.40
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.47
3.38
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Versatile and specialized programs
  • +Encouraging and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +Engaging curriculum and practical application
  • +Supportive environment and skill development
  • +Strong academic programs and helpful teachers
  • +Excellent reputation for studies and placements
  • +Diverse course offerings in engineering and technology
  • +Comprehensive maritime training and industry exposure
  • +Strong foundational knowledge in core maritime subjects
  • +Practical preparation for real-world industry challenges

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Well-equipped labs and effective curriculum
  • +Enjoyable campus life

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganized administration.
  • -Limited career support and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary confusion and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and student experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unheard and unsupported.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks for its professors and location, with ratings of 4.6 and approximately 4.57 respectively. Student life and internationality also score well, both around 4.13. Facilities are rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is accommodation, which scores 3.47, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution shines particularly bright in its **location**, receiving an outstanding rating. Student life and professors also score well, indicating a positive academic and social environment. However, **accommodation** presents a notable area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Internationality and value are also mid-range, suggesting potential for growth in these areas.

The institution garners excellent marks in most areas, with accommodation standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received a strong 4.5. Internationality is rated a solid 4, representing the only area below the highest tier. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture with consistently high scores.

This institution garners outstanding reviews across every aspect. With perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university excels universally, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students in all surveyed dimensions.

Nothing to show

This institution receives near-perfect scores across the board, reflecting outstanding performance in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all scoring a perfect five. While still strong, the university's internationality and value received slightly lower, though still excellent, ratings of four.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students highly praise the university, with ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.47/5. Recurring themes include excellent professors, varied courses, and a beautiful campus with ample facilities. Accommodation costs are noted as expensive.

With an average rating of 4.3/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight excellent faculty, engaging curriculum, and career preparation. No negative feedback was received.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and strong academics.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students describe the university as impactful and one of the best, highlighting strong foundational training and significant exposure to the maritime world.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, the single review highlights positive curriculum coverage, supportive staff, and good labs. Infrastructure and syllabus advancement are areas noted for improvement, representing ~0% negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
53%
50%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
30%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
7%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close