National University - NU vs University of the East vs STI Colleges vs De La Salle Lipa - DLSL vs Colegio de San Juan de Letran - CSJL
Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and supportive professors
- +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
- +Academic and extracurricular support
- +Hands-on teaching and skilled, approachable professors
- +Quality education and career growth support
- +Real-world application and lively campus environment
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Excellent nursing exam performance and faculty expertise
- +Innovative and effective teaching methods
- +Comprehensive learning resources
- +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programs
- +High-end facilities and professional personnel
- +Extracurricular activities and scholarships
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency create uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance are common complaints.
Nothing to show
This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.
With excellent marks in several key areas, this institution shines particularly bright in **Location** (4.4) and **Professors** (4.3), alongside a strong **Value** (4.3) score. Student life also garners positive feedback at 4.1. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are **Facilities** (3.7) and **Internationality** (3.8). **Accomodation**, at 3.56, is also an area that received the lowest rating.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. It achieved a perfect score of 5 in every category: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no identified weakest areas, as excellence is consistent throughout.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and student life. Accommodation and location also receive high marks. The university's strongest areas are its student experience and physical resources. Conversely, internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a more diverse and global campus community. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with only one area falling below a 4.0 rating.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.
With an average rating of 4.1/5, approximately 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, quality education, and hands-on learning. A small percentage of feedback mentions inconsistent P.E. professors and weak Wi-Fi.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
With a 5/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong faculty teaching and effective resources, particularly mentioning the nursing licensure exam performance.
With an average rating of 5/5, university reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight supportive faculty, excellent facilities, and a broad range of academic programs. Extra-curricular activities and scholarships are also appreciated.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I liked how my program took really good care of my fellow students. I would like to change a few things, but they would include technology upgrades and change of faculty. For the university, I would like the administration to listen to their students, for it is their source of profit.
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
