The Higher Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities of Tunis - ISEAHT vs Institut Supérieur des Technologies Médicales de Tunis vs Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT vs Misr University for Science and Technology vs Manouba University

Side-by-side comparison from 4 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Misr University for Science and Technology (4.50)
The Higher Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities of Tunis - ISEAHT: wins 0/7 categories
Institut Supérieur des Technologies Médicales de Tunis: wins 0/7 categories
Institut Supérieur des langues de Tunis - ISLT: wins 2/7 categories
Misr University for Science and Technology: wins 5/7 categories
Manouba University: wins 0/7 categories
Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Rades - ISET RADES: wins 0/7 categories
ESPRIT: wins 0/7 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
1.00
Not rated
2.00
3.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
1.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
1.00
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical teaching methods and effective professors
  • +Opportunities for leadership and campus involvement
  • +Supportive and understanding professors
  • +Innovative learning environment and future-ready skills
  • +Modern facilities and effective teaching methods

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and limited course options.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Performance across key university metrics reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in attracting high-quality faculty, evidenced by a perfect score for professors, and offers exceptional value for students. Conversely, facilities and location are areas needing significant improvement, both receiving low ratings. Student life, accommodation, and internationality fall into the mid-range, suggesting a generally adequate but not outstanding experience in these aspects.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff and vibrant student life, both earning a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and accommodation also score well at 4, as does its international appeal and overall value. The university's location receives the lowest mark at 3.5, representing its primary area for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university has a high average rating of 4/5 stars. Feedback highlights effective teaching methods and practical learning experiences. No negative reviews were submitted.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 2 positive reviews highlight faculty support and innovative programs. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close