Polytechnic University Of the Philippines - PUP vs University of Manila - UDM vs Technological Institute of the Philippines - TIP vs Far Eastern University vs STI Colleges
Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate, experienced, and inspiring professors
- +Affordable and practical education
- +Opportunities for personal growth and belonging
- +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
- +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
- +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
- +Strong engineering and architecture programs
- +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
- +Caring instructors and useful practical application
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Inspiring and refreshing campus environment
- +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
- +Supportive and inclusive community
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
- +Health and science focus
- +Practical communication skills
- -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsive administration and poor professor accountability.
- -Outdated facilities and curriculum that lacks current industry knowledge.
- -Unequal treatment and dismissive attitudes towards students based on their learning choices.
- -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
- -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
- -Minimal competitive program activities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement from instructors are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Communication and feedback from instructors are often lacking or poor.
This institution shows notable strengths in student life, with a score of 4.28, and value, rated at 4.27. Location also received a high mark at 4.17. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring 2.77. Other categories like professors, internationality, and accommodation fall within a moderate range.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.
This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
The university shines brightest in student life, achieving a remarkable 4.73 rating. Location and value are also highly regarded at 4.5 and 4.58 respectively. On the other hand, internationality received the lowest score at 4.0, indicating room for improvement in this area. Facilities, professors, and accommodation all received solid marks between 4.4 and 4.45.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.
Across the board, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating excellence in every surveyed area. Particularly outstanding are its facilities and professors, both receiving top marks. While no weak areas are identified, the consistent five-star ratings suggest a remarkably well-rounded and highly desirable university experience across all aspects of student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate professors, practical learning, and personal growth opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes issues with outdated facilities and administrative responsiveness.
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.
With a 4.33 average rating from 12 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight a welcoming and diverse community, expert faculty, and excellent facilities. Some students noted a lack of program-specific exploration, particularly in fieldwork.
All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.
The single review for the university is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests ~100% satisfaction, with commendations for its focus on health and sciences, and valuable learning in behavioral science.
For me, PUP is okay. Because it is a public university, the facilities are not that good, but considering that the tuition is free, it is good for less fortunate students who want to finish. I have good and bad experiences in PUP just like the profs who are not that hard to teach, there are profs who are very passionate about teaching.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .
Nothing to show