Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV vs Centro Escolar University - CEU vs National University - NU vs FEU Institute of Technology - FEU vs STI Colleges

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Centro Escolar University - CEU (4.80)
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Valenzuela - PLV: wins 2/5 categories
Centro Escolar University - CEU: wins 0/5 categories
National University - NU: wins 0/5 categories
FEU Institute of Technology - FEU: wins 1/5 categories
STI Colleges: wins 1/5 categories
Philippine Normal University - PNU: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: BS Information Technology
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Manila, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Information Technology
Alaminos, Philippines
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Education Home Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
4.20
3.33
5.00
Win
4.20
3.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.60
4.00
3.00
4.60
4.50
Professors
4.33
4.20
3.67
3.00
4.80
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.00
4.20
3.67
3.00
4.60
Win
4.50
Student life
5.00
4.40
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.50
Value
5.00
4.60
4.33
4.00
4.60
5.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.60
2.67
3.00
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Free tuition and social service contribution
  • +Supportive professors and manageable workload
  • +IT program specialization
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable faculty
  • +Opportunities for skill development and extracurriculars
  • +Well-equipped facilities for science and practical learning
  • +High-quality education and supportive professors
  • +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
  • +Academic and extracurricular support
  • +High-quality facilities and competent faculty
  • +Effective education and proper guidance
  • +Inspiring faculty and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experiences
  • +Innovative teaching methodologies and future-ready educator focus
  • +Strong curriculum and expert professors in education
  • +Development of well-rounded, 21st-century teachers
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Overcrowding and large class sizes reduce individual attention.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Unclear communication and a disorganized learning environment are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accommodation, alongside a top rating for Value. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.67. The weakest area noted is Internationality, with a rating of 4, while Professors are rated slightly lower at 4.33. Overall, it presents a very positive picture with standout strengths.

This institution garners exceptional ratings across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Accomodation**, both achieving a perfect 4.6. **Student Life** is also highly regarded at 4.4. The university demonstrates strong performance in **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality**, each scoring 4.2. While all metrics are positive, the ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** represent the comparatively lower, though still good, scores within this otherwise excellent profile.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.

The university excels in its **facilities**, receiving a perfect score. Areas like **professors**, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated moderately at a 3, indicating room for improvement. **Student life** and **value** both received positive scores of 4, suggesting these are strong points for prospective students.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, with a near-perfect rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.0, representing the weakest aspect. Overall, the university presents a robust offering across its facilities, location, internationality, and value.

This institution shines particularly bright in **professors** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores, and boasts excellent marks for **location**, **student life**, and **internationality**. Its **accommodation** also scores well. The sole area for potential improvement lies in its **facilities**, which received a rating of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three reviews are positive, highlighting tuition-free education and supportive professors. Students appreciate the social service component and balanced workloads, though some suggest expanding IT program specializations.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes include a welcoming atmosphere, approachable and effective professors, and well-equipped facilities.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.

The single review is positive, giving a 4/5 rating. It highlights high-quality facilities and competent faculty for computer studies and engineering. Negative feedback is absent.

All 5 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise teaching quality, supportive faculty, and practical skills for career success. They also appreciate facilities and a fun learning environment.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the university's effectiveness in developing well-rounded, future-ready educators with innovative approaches and excellent faculty expertise.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
80%
33%
0%
40%
50%
4★
33%
20%
33%
100%
60%
50%
3★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good example

In this university i found peace , friends and the quality education , its not only lectures but they make sure that the students are enjoying while learning . They will mold you into a quality employee or a future boss of your desired business , and that's what i love from them .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close