Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM (5.00)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM: wins 2/7 categories
Instituto Mexicano de Psicooncología - IMPo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.70
4.30
4.53
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.19
4.63
4.49
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.13
4.60
4.42
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.90
3.70
4.58
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.27
4.56
4.63
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Value
4.57
4.00
4.58
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.66
3.88
4.64
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated and highly qualified instructors
  • +Relevant and industry-tailored programs
  • +Excellent student training and preparation for the future
  • +Quality professors with relevant industry experience
  • +Flexible programs supporting work-study balance
  • +Supportive environment and accessible education
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Tuition-free education and career-focused programs
  • +Supportive faculty and diverse student community
  • +Flexible scheduling and affordable campus amenities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources frustrate students.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, receiving a high rating. **Student Life** and **Location** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Facilities** are rated lower compared to other aspects, indicating potential areas for improvement. The university scores moderately well in **Professors** and **Internationality**.

This university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with notable strengths in Professors (4.6), Location (4.625), and Student Life (4.55). Facilities also score well at 4.3, contributing to a positive student experience. However, areas for development include Accomodation (3.875) and Internationality (3.7), representing the lowest-rated aspects among the surveyed categories. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths, notably in its professors and value for money, both receiving perfect scores. Student life also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents a clear weakness, scoring the lowest. Facilities and location are moderately rated, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strong points.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 34 reviews, ~82% are positive, praising dedicated teachers and well-structured courses. A small amount of feedback (~0%) mentions challenges with infrastructure.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 11 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students appreciate the quality of professors and flexible study programs. There is no negative feedback.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight highly qualified professors, excellent curricula, and outstanding faculty support. They also appreciate tuition-free education, flexible scheduling, and available amenities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
36%
62%
0%
50%
100%
0%
4★
32%
27%
35%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
36%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close