Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 87 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Tres Culturas - UTC : wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Global Law
Best programme: Art and Design
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
34 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.13
4.30
4.52
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
4.20
4.75
4.63
4.52
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.10
4.48
4.60
Win
4.42
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Internationality
3.90
2.60
3.70
4.61
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Student life
4.24
4.15
4.56
4.64
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.59
4.15
4.00
4.64
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Accommodation
3.64
2.63
3.88
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Flexible study schedules and efficient degree completion
  • +Good teaching quality and career-focused outcomes
  • +Adequate study facilities and convenient campus structure
  • +Quality professors with relevant industry experience
  • +Flexible programs supporting work-study balance
  • +Supportive environment and accessible education
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
  • +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
  • +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Location (4.75) and Professors (4.475). Student Life and Facilities also receive strong marks. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Accomodation (2.625) and Internationality (2.6), suggesting these aspects may require considerable improvement for prospective students. Overall, the university offers a compelling experience with room for growth.

This university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with notable strengths in Professors (4.6), Location (4.625), and Student Life (4.55). Facilities also score well at 4.3, contributing to a positive student experience. However, areas for development include Accomodation (3.875) and Internationality (3.7), representing the lowest-rated aspects among the surveyed categories. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

With a ~4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include appreciation for useful academic programs and flexible scheduling. No negative reviews were submitted.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 11 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students appreciate the quality of professors and flexible study programs. There is no negative feedback.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.

Rating distribution
5★
52%
40%
36%
68%
0%
50%
0%
4★
30%
20%
27%
38%
0%
0%
100%
3★
18%
40%
36%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close