Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack vs Higher School of Commerce and Administration - ESCA

Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/5 categories
Higher School of Commerce and Administration - ESCA: wins 0/5 categories
Center for Higher Studies in Legal and Criminological Sciences - CESCIJUC: wins 3/5 categories
UCAD University - UCAD : wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Pedagogical Education
Mexico City, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.64
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.10
4.50
Not rated
5.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.41
Not rated
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.88
4.59
Not rated
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.20
4.63
Not rated
5.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.60
4.63
Not rated
3.00
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.63
4.66
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs and academic excellence
  • +Strong sense of community and comprehensive student development
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Amazing professors and learning opportunities.
  • +Great overall experience despite some professor variability.
  • +Diverse courses and flexible schedules
  • +Affordable fees and degree options
  • +Expert professors with strong credentials

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common frustrations.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching quality is a concern.
  • -Excessive workload and demanding assignments are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues cause frustration and confusion.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker areas, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Internationality are rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. Areas for improvement are evident in the **accommodation** offerings, which garnered the lowest rating. Other aspects like facilities, location, student life, and value present a more moderate and balanced picture.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these domains. Conversely, the university's accommodation received a score of zero, suggesting this is a significant area for improvement and a notable weakness.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and comprehensive study programs. A small amount of feedback (~17%) indicated minor issues with bathrooms.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, this university garners positive feedback, with ~50% of reviews being highly favorable. A small percentage (~0%) of feedback is negative, citing inconsistent professor quality as a minor concern.

With a single review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The student praised its academic offerings, diverse course options, and affordable fees, while noting some administrative shortcomings.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
55%
67%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
24%
39%
0%
0%
50%
100%
0%
3★
21%
3%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close