Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM (5.00)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM: wins 2/7 categories
UCAD University - UCAD : wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Mexico City, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.50
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.50
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.10
4.41
4.33
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.90
4.59
Win
3.67
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.63
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Value
4.59
4.63
3.67
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.64
4.66
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Tuition-free education and career-focused programs
  • +Supportive faculty and diverse student community
  • +Flexible scheduling and affordable campus amenities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources frustrate students.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths, notably in its professors and value for money, both receiving perfect scores. Student life also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents a clear weakness, scoring the lowest. Facilities and location are moderately rated, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strong points.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight highly qualified professors, excellent curricula, and outstanding faculty support. They also appreciate tuition-free education, flexible scheduling, and available amenities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
67%
67%
0%
50%
100%
0%
4★
30%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
3%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close