Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/2 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/2 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/2 categories
Professional Institute of Therapies and Humanities - IPETH: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad de Ecatepec: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Applied Medical Sciences
Mexico City, Mexico
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Science of Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.52
3.67
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Location
4.20
4.52
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.10
4.42
4.33
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.90
4.61
3.67
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.24
4.64
3.67
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
Value
4.59
4.64
3.67
Not rated
3.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.64
4.67
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Supportive and understandable teaching with focus on applied learning.
  • +Excellent educational programs and certifications.
  • +Great facilities contributing to a satisfactory experience.
  • +Dedicated, inspiring professors
  • +Hands-on learning with practical facilities
  • +High academic level and guidance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication.
  • -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative and management support creates frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient student support services impact learning.
Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. Value also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a moderate score of 3. Location also performed well, but was not as strong as the top-rated categories.

This institution receives excellent marks, particularly in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect five. Accomodation and Location are also strong points, both earning a four. The weakest area, while still solid, is Location at a four, with all other aspects performing at the highest level.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights excellent teachers, effective learning methods, and great facilities. This overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%) indicates a strong student satisfaction.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise dedicated professors and hands-on learning opportunities. The Communications Sciences program specifically highlights practical experience in radio and TV booths.

Rating distribution
5★
52%
68%
67%
0%
50%
100%
100%
4★
30%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
3%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close