Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack vs Gustavo A Madero Technological Institute II - ITGAM II
Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
- +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
- +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
- +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
- +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
- +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Strong academic programs and practical preparation
- +Supportive and effective professors
- +Excellent facilities and extracurricular opportunities
- +Supportive and understandable teaching with focus on applied learning.
- +Excellent educational programs and certifications.
- +Great facilities contributing to a satisfactory experience.
- +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
- +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
- +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
- -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
- -Facilities and resources are inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are outdated.
- -Lack of timely and effective communication.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.
This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors earning the highest rating. Student Life and Location are also well-regarded, alongside Value. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well. The weakest area of performance is Accomodation, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. Value also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a moderate score of 3. Location also performed well, but was not as strong as the top-rated categories.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.
With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.
University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback was noted.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights excellent teachers, effective learning methods, and great facilities. This overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%) indicates a strong student satisfaction.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.
