Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO vs Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México - ITAM vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México - ITAM (5.00)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México - ITAM: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Normal 2 de Nezahualcóyotl - EN2N: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.64
4.29
4.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.10
4.47
3.33
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.47
4.67
Win
4.41
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.88
3.76
4.00
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.20
4.53
4.33
4.63
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.60
4.29
4.67
Win
4.63
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.63
4.19
3.33
4.66
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs and academic excellence
  • +Strong sense of community and comprehensive student development
  • +Expert faculty and specialized programs
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +Supportive student environment and campus amenities
  • +Diverse programs, enriching activities, and leadership opportunities.
  • +Real-world learning and valuable networking for career advancement.
  • +Supportive atmosphere, strong foundational knowledge, and analytical skill development.
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common frustrations.
  • -Outdated study programs and insufficient coordinator training are a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning experiences.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker areas, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Internationality are rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas for potential improvement.

This university receives consistently strong marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a near-perfect score. Professors and Location also garnered high praise. Areas for improvement are evident in Internationality, which received the lowest rating. Facilities and Value scored well, while Accomodation also performed competently.

Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in its **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive strong marks at 4.33. In contrast, **Location** and **Accomodation** present the lowest scores, each at 3.33, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. **Internationality** sits at a solid 4.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and comprehensive study programs. A small amount of feedback (~17%) indicated minor issues with bathrooms.

Approximately 95% of reviews are highly positive, praising expert faculty and enriching academic programs with practical experience. A small percentage (~5%) wished for more updated curricula and better coordinator training.

All three reviews are highly positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes highlight the university's extensive programs and activities, and its value as a life experience fostering real-world skills and friendships.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
55%
58%
100%
67%
0%
50%
0%
4★
24%
26%
0%
39%
0%
0%
0%
3★
21%
11%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close