Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - UAM vs Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack
Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and supportive teaching staff
- +High-quality, relevant curriculum and academic resources
- +Excellent facilities and affordability
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
- +Relevant, industry-tailored programs and academic excellence
- +Strong sense of community and comprehensive student development
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Amazing professors and learning opportunities.
- +Great overall experience despite some professor variability.
- +Excellent professors and helpful instruction
- +Strong sense of community and welcoming classmates
- +Positive overall experience and quality of education
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is poor and unclear.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common frustrations.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent or ineffective teaching quality is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving ratings above 4.6. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.81, closely followed by **Location** and **Internationality**, which are slightly below 4.0. Facilities and Professors also score well.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker areas, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Internationality are rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. Areas for improvement are evident in the **accommodation** offerings, which garnered the lowest rating. Other aspects like facilities, location, student life, and value present a more moderate and balanced picture.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, notably achieving perfect scores in **Location** and **Value**. It also garners high marks for **Professors** and **Accomodation**, suggesting a positive experience in these critical aspects. Conversely, **Student Life** received a stark zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated moderately, placing them in the middle ground of the university's offerings.
All 10 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.7/5. Students praise the rigorous and relevant curriculum, supportive and expert teaching staff, and excellent facilities.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and comprehensive study programs. A small amount of feedback (~17%) indicated minor issues with bathrooms.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, this university garners positive feedback, with ~50% of reviews being highly favorable. A small percentage (~0%) of feedback is negative, citing inconsistent professor quality as a minor concern.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%) with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students praise professors' expertise and helpfulness, alongside a strong sense of community and welcoming classmates. Minor criticism exists regarding accessibility for disabled students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show