Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 115 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 1/5 categories
Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP: wins 0/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 1/5 categories
Center for Higher Studies in Legal and Criminological Sciences - CESCIJUC: wins 3/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Law
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Chemical and Process Engineering
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Pedagogical Education
Category ratings
Facilities
3.64
4.29
4.50
3.10
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
4.10
4.47
4.50
4.10
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.12
4.47
4.41
4.30
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.88
3.76
4.59
3.20
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.20
4.53
4.63
3.89
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
4.60
4.29
4.63
4.20
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.63
4.19
4.66
Win
2.80
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs and academic excellence
  • +Strong sense of community and comprehensive student development
  • +Expert faculty and specialized programs
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +Supportive student environment and campus amenities
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Accessible short career options with good teachers
  • +Personal and academic improvement opportunities
  • +Direct path to employment after high school

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Diverse courses and flexible schedules
  • +Affordable fees and degree options
  • +Expert professors with strong credentials
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common frustrations.
  • -Outdated study programs and insufficient coordinator training are a concern.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Limited food variety and a small library with few books are dissatisfying.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Excessive workload and demanding assignments are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues cause frustration and confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker areas, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Internationality are rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas for potential improvement.

This university receives consistently strong marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a near-perfect score. Professors and Location also garnered high praise. Areas for improvement are evident in Internationality, which received the lowest rating. Facilities and Value scored well, while Accomodation also performed competently.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors received a near-perfect score of 4.3, complemented by a highly rated location (4.1) and strong value for money (4.2). Student life also scored well at 3.89. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the primary area for improvement, with a rating of 2.8, followed by facilities at 3.1. Internationality stands at a moderate 3.2.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these domains. Conversely, the university's accommodation received a score of zero, suggesting this is a significant area for improvement and a notable weakness.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and comprehensive study programs. A small amount of feedback (~17%) indicated minor issues with bathrooms.

Approximately 95% of reviews are highly positive, praising expert faculty and enriching academic programs with practical experience. A small percentage (~5%) wished for more updated curricula and better coordinator training.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 31 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise accessible teachers and career opportunities. Some negative feedback notes small spaces and untidy bathrooms.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a single review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The student praised its academic offerings, diverse course options, and affordable fees, while noting some administrative shortcomings.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
58%
67%
55%
0%
50%
0%
4★
24%
26%
39%
29%
0%
0%
100%
3★
21%
11%
3%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close